Expresses the sense of the Congress that: (1) the United States Trade Representative (USTR) and the Secretary of the Treasury should initiate discussions with Mexican and Canadian Government officials to achieve parity in the duty-free allowance structure (personal allowance for duty-free merchandise purchased abroad by returning residents) of the respective North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) countries; and (2) in the event that parity is not achieved within one year after enactment of this resolution, the USTR and the Secretary should submit recommendations to the Congress on whether legislative changes are necessary to bring the United States duty-free allowance to a lower amount to conform to the allowance levels established by the other NAFTA countries.
[Congressional Bills 105th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 51 Introduced in House (IH)]
105th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 51
Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be parity among
the countries that are parties to the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) with respect to the personal allowance for duty-free
merchandise purchased abroad by returning residents.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 20, 1997
Mr. Bonilla (for himself, Mr. Ortiz, Mr. Skeen, Mr. Baldacci, and Mr.
Reyes) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Congress that there should be parity among
the countries that are parties to the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) with respect to the personal allowance for duty-free
merchandise purchased abroad by returning residents.
Whereas the duty-free allowance for returning residents is an important element
of trade and tourism;
Whereas the United States provides each United States resident who is returning
from Mexico after a stay of any duration a personal exemption from duty
on merchandise valued at up to $400 once every 30 days (or up to $200 if
the individual has claimed an exemption within 30 days before his or her
arrival in the United States), including in both instances one liter of
liquor or wine and 200 cigarettes or 100 cigars;
Whereas Mexico has a 2-tiered duty-free allowance for its returning residents,
set at the equivalent of $50 for ``frontier'' residents of a 25
kilometer strip along Mexico's northern border and the equivalent of
$300 for residents who live in the interior of Mexico;
Whereas interior residents of Mexico are also permitted up to 3 liters of wine,
beer, or liquor and up to 20 individual boxes of cigarettes or 50 cigars
or 250 grams of tobacco;
Whereas Canada provides each returning Canadian resident absent for more than 7
days a duty-free allowance on merchandise valued at up to the equivalent
of $350; after an absence of 48 hours, a returning Canadian resident has
a duty-free allowance of the equivalent of $140 and after an absence of
24 hours the Canadian allowance is the equivalent of $35; and Canadian
residents returning after an absence of at least 48 hours are also
provided a duty-free allowance for 1.14 liters of liquor or wine or 24
12-ounce bottles of beer or ale, and 50 cigars, 200 cigarettes, 200
grams of manufactured tobacco, or 200 tobacco sticks;
Whereas in 1995 Mexico announced that duty-free stores will be established at
multiple locations on the Mexican side of the United States-Mexico
border, which will sell their merchandise to United States residents
traveling to Mexico and will benefit from the generous United States
duty-free allowance afforded to its residents;
Whereas with the advent of duty-free stores on the Mexican side of the border
serving United States residents, the inequity between the duty-free
allowances of the 2 countries is further exacerbated, placing United
States retail establishments who service Mexican residents at an unfair
competitive advantage;
Whereas the United States entered into the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada with the intent of phasing out tariff
barriers among the 3 countries; and
Whereas it violates the spirit of the NAFTA for the countries to maintain
restrictive duty-free allowance policies which are not reciprocal: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That--
(1) the United States Trade Representative and the
Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary
of Commerce, should initiate discussions with officials of the
Governments of Mexico and Canada to achieve parity in the duty-
free allowance structure of the United States, Mexico, and
Canada; and
(2) in the event that parity in the duty-free allowances of
the 3 countries is not reached within 1 year after the date on
which this concurrent resolution is adopted, the United States
Trade Representative and the Secretary of the Treasury should
submit recommendations to the Congress on whether legislative
changes are necessary to bring the United States duty-free
allowance to a lower amount to conform to the allowance levels
established in the other countries that are parties to the
NAFTA.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line