Directs the President to review certain steel tariff exclusions granted to foreign companies and to revoke: (1) any exclusion that would have been denied pursuant to an objection if the objection had been timely filed; and (2) any exclusion that was obtained by materially false or misleading information regarding the availability of a competing domestic product.
[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2877 Introduced in House (IH)]
108th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2877
To provide for the revocation of certain exclusions from the safeguard
measures imposed by the President on imports of certain steel products.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 24, 2003
Mr. Lipinski (for himself, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Costello, Mr. Cramer, Mr.
Mollohan, Mr. Visclosky, Mr. Evans, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Shimkus, Mr.
Crane, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr.
Sanders, Mr. LaHood, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Jackson of
Illinois, Mr. Emanuel, and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill;
which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To provide for the revocation of certain exclusions from the safeguard
measures imposed by the President on imports of certain steel products.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REVIEW AND REVOCATION OF CERTAIN EXCLUSIONS FROM SAFEGUARD
MEASURES ON CERTAIN STEEL PRODUCTS.
The President shall take the necessary steps to--
(1) review each exclusion of a product, granted before the
enactment of this Act, from the imposition of safeguard
measures imposed under Proclamation 7529 of March 5, 2002, on
imports of certain steel products;
(2) revoke any exclusion described in paragraph (1)--
(A) to which an objection was submitted pursuant to
notice published by the Office of the United States
Trade Representative in the Federal Register, but not
within the time period prescribed in such notice; and
(B) that would have been denied if the objection
had been timely filed; and
(3) revoke any exclusion described in paragraph (1) if the
person requesting the exclusion is found to have submitted any
materially false or misleading information, in connection with
the request, regarding the availability of a competing domestic
product.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line