Declares that, with respect to any authorization for a renewable energy project and the attendant preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, a Federal agency is not required to: (1) identify alternative project locations or actions other than the proposed action and the no action alternative; or (2) analyze the environmental effects of alternative locations or actions other than those submitted by the project proponent.
Requires such agency, in any such assessment or impact statement, to identify and analyze solely the environmental effects and potential mitigation measures of: (1) the proposed action; and (2) the no action alternative.
Provides that, in preparing an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement, such agency shall only consider public comments that specifically address the preferred action and that are filed within 20 days after publication of a draft environmental assessment or draft environmental impact statement.
Defines "renewable energy project," for purpose of this Act, as: (1) any proposal to utilize an energy source other than nuclear power, coal, oil, or natural gas; and (2) including but not limited to the use of wind, solar, geothermal, or tidal forces to generate energy.
[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4513 Introduced in House (IH)]
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 4513
To provide that in preparing an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement required under section 102 of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 with respect to any action
authorizing a renewable energy project, no Federal agency is required
to identify alternative project locations or actions other than the
proposed action and the no action alternative, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 4, 2004
Mr. Pombo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Resources
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To provide that in preparing an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement required under section 102 of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 with respect to any action
authorizing a renewable energy project, no Federal agency is required
to identify alternative project locations or actions other than the
proposed action and the no action alternative, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS.
(a) Compliance With NEPA for Renewable Energy Projects.--
Notwithstanding any other law, in preparing an environmental assessment
or environmental impact statement required under section 102 of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) with respect
to any action authorizing a renewable energy project under the
jurisdiction of a Federal agency--
(1) no Federal agency is required to identify alternative
project locations or actions other than the proposed action and
the no action alternative; and
(2) no Federal agency is required to analyze the
environmental effects of alternative locations or actions other
than those submitted by the project proponent.
(b) Consideration of Alternatives.--In any environmental assessment
or environmental impact statement referred to in subsection (a), the
Federal agency shall only identify and analyze the environmental
effects and potential mitigation measures of--
(1) the proposed action; and
(2) the no action alternative.
(c) Public Comment.--In preparing an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement referred to in subsection (a), the
Federal agency shall only consider public comments that specifically
address the preferred action and that are filed within 20 days after
publication of a draft environmental assessment or draft environmental
impact statement. Notwithstanding any other law, compliance with this
subsection is deemed to satisfy section 102(2) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)) and the applicable
regulations and administrative guidelines with respect to proposed
renewable energy projects.
(d) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term ``renewable
energy project''--
(1) means any proposal to utilize an energy source other
than nuclear power or the combustion of coal, oil or natural
gas; and
(2) includes but is not be limited to the use of wind,
solar, geothermal, or tidal forces to generate energy.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Resources.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 672 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4513 and H.R. 4529 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. A specified amendment is in order.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 672. (consideration: CR H3981-3990; text of measure as introduced: CR H3981-3982)
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4513 and H.R. 4529 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 4513.
DEBATE - The House proceeded with ten minutes of debate on the Pombo amendment.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4132-4133)
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 186 (Roll no. 242).
Roll Call #242 (House)Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 229 - 186 (Roll no. 242).
Roll Call #242 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.