Fairness in School Discipline Act of 2004 - Sets forth Federal minimum due process requirements in cases of suspensions of public school students.
[Congressional Bills 108th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2404 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
108th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2404
Entitled the ``Fairness in School Discipline Act of 2004''.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 11, 2004
Mr. Miller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
Entitled the ``Fairness in School Discipline Act of 2004''.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness in School Discipline Act of
2004''.
SEC. 2. PURPOSES.
The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to restore moral authority to the public schools and
support their efforts to create and maintain an orderly school
environment conducive to learning;
(2) to correct widespread misperceptions regarding Federal
due process requirements in the public school context; and
(3) to enforce the minimum Federal due process obligations
of the public schools, pursuant to section 5 of the 14th
amendment to the United States Constitution, and in accordance
with the interpretation of the due process clause by the United
States Supreme Court in Goss v. Lopez (419 U.S. 565 (1975)).
SEC. 3. DUE PROCESS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW.
(a) Suspensions of 10 Days or Less.--In connection with suspension
of public school students for 10 days or less, due process requires
that the principal or her designee explain to the student what he is
accused of doing and the basis for the accusation and give the student
an opportunity to tell his side of the story in an informal, non-
adversarial meeting. No right of appeal from the decision of the
principal is necessary to satisfy this statute. The meeting should
typically take place before the student is removed from school;
provided, however, that where the principal or her designee determines
that the student presents a continuing danger to person or property or
may be disruptive to the academic process, the student may be removed
immediately. The procedures described in this subsection shall follow
soon after the removal.
(b) Suspensions of More Than 10 Days.--In connection with
suspension of public school students for more than 10 days, the
following due process protections are required in addition to those
described in subsection (a):
(1) The student and his parent or guardian should be
notified of the suspension and be given an opportunity to
attend an informal, non-adversarial follow-up meeting with the
principal at the school or other location designated by the
principal.
(2) Where the meeting described in subsection (a) does not
occur before the student is removed from school, the due
process required by subsections (a) and (b)(1) may be afforded
the student at one meeting described in subsection (b)(1).
(3) The student shall be permitted a single appeal of the
principal's decision to a body designated by the school board
or a school-based committee of teachers, parents and
administrators. No right of appeal from the decision of the
designated body is necessary to satisfy this statute.
(c) Waiver.--The student shall be deemed to waive his procedural
rights by remaining silent, or, where the hearing is held after the
suspension, shall be deemed to waive his procedural rights by failing
to appear.
(d) Other Claims.--Nothing in this Act shall prevent any person
from bringing a claim based on any other legally cognizable right in a
court of competent jurisdiction.
(e) Federal Minimum.--Nothing in this statute should be construed
to prohibit any State or local government or local education authority
from providing additional procedural protections not required by
Federal law.
(f) Severability.--If any provision of this Act or its application
to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does not
affect other provisions or applications of this Act that can be given
effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end
the provisions of this Act are declared to be severable.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line