(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Reaffirms Congress' commitment to the policies and objectives of the Bayh-Dole Act, which amended patent and trademark laws, on the 25th anniversary of its enactment.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 319 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 319
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the successful and
substantial contributions of the amendments to the patent and trademark
laws that were enacted in 1980 (Public Law 96-517; commonly known as
the ``Bayh-Dole Act''), on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of its
enactment.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 16, 2005
Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Boehlert, Mr. Gordon,
Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Berman, Mr. Ehlers, Mr. Wu, Mr. Coble, Ms. Zoe
Lofgren of California, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Jenkins,
Mr. Feeney, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Honda, Mr. Miller of North Carolina, and
Mr. Inglis of South Carolina) submitted the following concurrent
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the successful and
substantial contributions of the amendments to the patent and trademark
laws that were enacted in 1980 (Public Law 96-517; commonly known as
the ``Bayh-Dole Act''), on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of its
enactment.
Whereas article I, section 8, clause 8, of the United States Constitution
provides that Congress shall have Power ``[t]o promote the Progress of
Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and
Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and
Discoveries'';
Whereas the 96th Congress enacted Public Law 96-517, entitled ``An Act to amend
the patent and trademark laws'' (commonly known as the ``Bayh-Dole
Act'', in honor of its two lead sponsors in the Senate, the Honorable
Birch Bayh and the Honorable Bob Dole), in 1980;
Whereas for 15 to 20 years before the enactment of the Bayh-Dole Act, Members of
Congress considered, discussed, and deliberated on the proper resolution
of issues implicated by the Act;
Whereas before the enactment of the Bayh-Dole Act, the United States was
confronted by great economic uncertainty and presented with
unprecedented new challenges from foreign industrial competition;
Whereas before 1980, only 5 percent of patents owned by the Federal Government
were used by the private sector--a situation that resulted in the
American people being denied the benefits of further development,
disclosure, exploitation, and commercialization of the Government's
patent portfolio;
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act established a ``single, uniform national policy
designed to . . . encourage private industry to utilize government
financed inventions through the commitment of the risk capital necessary
to develop such inventions to the point of commercial application'', and
eliminated the 26 different Federal agency policies that had existed
regarding the use of the results of federally funded research and
development;
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act fundamentally changed the Federal Government's patent
policies by enabling inventors or their employers to retain patent
rights in inventions developed as part of federally funded research
grants, thereby promoting licensing and the leveraging of contributions
by the private sector towards applied research, and facilitating the
transfer of technology from the laboratory bench to the marketplace;
Whereas examples of the tangible products and technologies that have resulted
from the Bayh-Dole Act include, inter alia, an improved method for
preserving organs for transplant, a lithography system to enable the
manufacture of nano-scale devices, the development of new
chemotherapeutic agents, the discovery of new therapies for the
treatment of patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, and countless
other advances in materials, electronics, energy, environmental
protection, and information technologies;
Whereas these new therapies, technologies, and inventions, which have resulted
from the collaborative environment fostered by the Bayh-Dole Act, have
directly contributed to the ability of medical researchers to discover
and commercialize new treatments that alleviate patient suffering,
enhance the ability of doctors to diagnose and treat disease, and target
promising new medical research;
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act has stimulated two of the major contemporary
scientific trends of the last quarter century--the development of the
biotechnology and information communications industries--and the Act is
poised to continue playing a central role in new fields of innovative
activities, including nanotechnology;
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act has resulted in benefitting taxpayers by generating
millions of dollars in annual licensing royalties for universities and
nonprofit institutions--revenues that are reinvested in furtherance of
additional research and education programs;
Whereas the incentives provided under the Act and the exchange of technology and
research between and among the research community, small businesses, and
industry, have resulted in new cooperative ventures and the emergence of
sophisticated high-technology businesses, which provide a major catalyst
for innovation and entrepreneurial activity;
Whereas more than 4,000 new companies have been created to develop and market
academic research and development since 1980, and it is estimated that
nearly 2300 of these companies were still in operation at the end of
fiscal year 2003;
Whereas Lita Nelsen, director of the Technology Licensing Office at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has described the Bayh-Dole Act
as ``one of the most successful pieces of economic development and job-
creation legislation in recent history'';
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act was described in a 2002 article in The Economist (US)
as ``[p]ossibly the most inspired piece of legislation to be enacted in
America over the past half-century . . . More than anything, this single
policy measure helped to reverse America's precipitous slide into
industrial irrelevance'';
Whereas the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that university
administrators and small business representatives considered the Bayh-
Dole Act to have had ``a significant impact on their research and
innovation efforts'';
Whereas a study of business executives found that 9 out of 10 identified the
Bayh-Dole Act as an ``important factor'' in decisions to fund research
and development in academia;
Whereas Howard Bremer, who served as patent counsel to the Wisconsin Alumni
Research Foundation from 1960 to 1988, once observed that, ``[o]ne
important factor . . . is that the success was achieved without cost to
the taxpayer. In other words, no separate appropriation of government
funds was needed to establish or manage the effort'';
Whereas a 1998 GAO study found that the law had a positive impact on all
involved and that the increased commercialization of federally funded
research that resulted from implementation of the Act had positively
affected both the Federal Government and the American people;
Whereas the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology reported
to the President in May 2003 that the Act ``dramatically improved the
nation's ability to move ideas from research and development to the
marketplace and into commerce'' and that the system put in place for
transferring technology from nonprofit institutions, which includes
universities and Government laboratories, to the private sector has
worked well;
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act states, ``[i]t is the policy and objective of the
Congress to promote the utilization of inventions arising from
federally-supported research or development; . . . to promote
collaboration between commercial concerns and nonprofit organizations,
including universities; . . . to promote the commercialization and
public availability of inventions made in the United States by United
States industry and labor; [and] to ensure that the Government obtains
sufficient rights in federally-supported inventions to meet the needs of
the Government and protect the public against nonuse or unreasonable use
of inventions'';
Whereas the Congress finds that the policies and objectives of the Bayh-Dole Act
have been achieved and that the patent law has played a critical role in
stimulating technological advances and disclosing useful technical
information to the public;
Whereas the Congress finds that federally-funded research at universities and
Government laboratories and the partnerships between such nonprofit
institutions and the private sector play a critical role in developing
the technologies that allow the United States to lead the world in
innovation; and
Whereas the Bayh-Dole Act and its subsequent amendments, which include the
Trademark Clarification Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-620), have played a
vital role in enabling the United States to become renowned as the world
leader in scientific research, innovation, ingenuity, and collaborative
research that involves institutions of higher education and the private
sector: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) the Bayh-Dole Act (Public Law 96-517) has made
substantial contributions to the advancement of scientific and
technological knowledge, fostered dramatic improvements in
public health and safety, strengthened the higher education
system in the United States, served as a catalyst for the
development of new domestic industries that have created tens
of thousands of new jobs for American citizens, strengthened
States and local communities across the country, and benefitted
the economic and trade policies of the United States; and
(2) it is appropriate that the Congress reaffirm its
commitment to the policies and objectives of the Bayh-Dole Act
by acknowledging its contributions and commemorating the silver
anniversary of its enactment.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property Discharged.
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-409.
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 109-409.
Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 162.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line