Expresses deep concern that the President's 2002 order authorizing electronic surveillance of U.S. persons without a warrant violates existing law. Urges the President to rescind that order.
Notes that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has proved to be an expeditious means of assuring approval of warrant requests and has responded favorably to nearly all warrant applications.
Reiterates support for maintaining a careful balance between national security and the privacy of Americans.
Urges the President to: (1) report to Congress on the number of U.S. persons who were the subject of electronic surveillance without a warrant, the rationale for the selection of those persons for such surveillance instead of pursuing an order under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA), and the plots or other terrorist actions that were defeated subsequent to the use of this authority; and (2) submit a request for legislation to Congress to amend FISA if the President considers that Act to be in need of reform.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 330 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 330
Expressing the concern of Congress that the President's 2002 order
authorizing electronic surveillance of United States persons without a
warrant violates existing law prohibiting such electronic surveillance,
and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 22, 2005
Mrs. Tauscher (for herself and Mr. Conyers) submitted the following
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary, and in addition to the Select Committee on Intelligence
(Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the concern of Congress that the President's 2002 order
authorizing electronic surveillance of United States persons without a
warrant violates existing law prohibiting such electronic surveillance,
and for other purposes.
Whereas the Federal Government has a duty to gather information about threats to
the United States in a timely manner to prevent, disrupt, or otherwise
mitigate potentially devastating attacks on the United States;
Whereas a legal framework has been established through the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) to govern the use of electronic
surveillance to acquire foreign intelligence information;
Whereas the standard of proof required for issuance of an order authorizing
electronic surveillance or a physical search under FISA is a showing of
probable cause that the subject of such order is a foreign power or an
agent of a foreign power;
Whereas under FISA, the President may authorize electronic surveillance to
acquire foreign intelligence information for up to one year without a
court order in certain situations;
Whereas in urgent situations, the National Security Agency may conduct
electronic surveillance for 72 hours before being required to seek
retroactive permission from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court;
Whereas the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of
2001 (Public Law 107-56), signed by President Bush, expanded the scope
of FISA by providing for multipoint electronic surveillance authority
and expanded use of pen registers and trap and trace devices and access
to business records;
Whereas other legislation, including the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Protection Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458), further expanded
authorities under FISA;
Whereas during 2004, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court approved 1,754
of the 1,758 requests for an order authorizing electronic surveillance
or a physical search submitted by the Federal Government, during 2003,
such Court approved 1,724 of 1,727 such requests, during 2002, such
Court approved 1,228 of 1,228 such requests, during 2001, such Court
approved 934 of 934 such requests, during 2000, such Court approved
1,012 of 1,012 such requests, and in 1999, such Court approved 880 of
886 such requests, with the remaining 6 being approved in 2000;
Whereas it was reported by the New York Times on December 15, 2005, that
President Bush signed an order in 2002 authorizing the National Security
Agency to listen to conversations of citizens of the United States as
well as foreign nationals in the United States without seeking approval
from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court;
Whereas it was reported that under this program, the National Security Agency
eavesdrops without warrants on up to 500 people in the United States at
any given time; and
Whereas current law forbids warrantless electronic surveillance of United States
persons: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That Congress--
(1) expresses deep concern that the President's 2002 order
authorizing electronic surveillance of United States persons
without a warrant violates existing law prohibiting such
electronic surveillance;
(2) urges the President to rescind the 2002 order
authorizing such electronic surveillance of United States
persons without a warrant;
(3) notes that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
has proved to be an expeditious means of assuring approval of
warrant requests and has responded favorably to nearly all
warrant applications;
(4) reiterates its support for maintaining a careful
balance between national security and the privacy of Americans;
(5) urges the President to report to Congress on the number
of United States persons who were the subject of electronic
surveillance without a warrant, the rationale for the selection
of such persons for such surveillance instead of pursuing an
order under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978,
and the plots or other terrorist actions that were defeated
subsequent to the use of this authority; and
(6) calls on the President to submit a request for
legislation to Congress to amend such Act if the President
considers it to be in need of reform.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line