(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) the anti-secession law of the People's Republic of China (PRC) provides a legal justification for the use of force against Taiwan, altering the status quo in the region, and thus is of grave concern to the United States; (2) the President of the United States should direct all appropriate U.S. officials to reflect the grave concern with which the United States views the passage of China's anti-secession law in particular, and the growing Chinese military threats to Taiwan in general, to their counterpart officials in the Government of the PRC; and (3) the U.S. Government should reaffirm its policy that the future of Taiwan should be resolved by peaceful means and with the consent of the people of Taiwan, and continue to encourage dialogue between Taiwan and the PRC.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 98 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 98
Expressing the grave concern of Congress regarding the recent passage
of the anti-secession law by the National People's Congress of the
People's Republic of China.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 15, 2005
Mr. Hyde (for himself, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Burton
of Indiana, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Issa, Mrs.
Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Pence, Mr. Mack, Mr. Wilson of South
Carolina, and Mr. Rohrabacher) submitted the following concurrent
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International
Relations
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the grave concern of Congress regarding the recent passage
of the anti-secession law by the National People's Congress of the
People's Republic of China.
Whereas on December 9, 2003, President George W. Bush stated it is the policy of
the United States to ``oppose any unilateral decision, by either China
or Taiwan, to change the status quo'';
Whereas in the past few years, the Government of the United States has urged
both Taiwan and the People's Republic of China to maintain restraint;
Whereas the National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China passed
its anti-secession law on March 14, 2005, which constitutes a unilateral
change to the status quo in the Taiwan Strait;
Whereas the passage of China's anti-secession law escalates tensions between
Taiwan and the People's Republic of China and is an impediment to cross-
strait dialogue;
Whereas the purpose of China's anti-secession law is to create a legal framework
for possible use of force against Taiwan and mandates Chinese military
action under certain circumstances, including when ``possibilities for a
peaceful reunification should be completely exhausted'';
Whereas the Department of Defense's Report on the Military Power of the People's
Republic of China for Fiscal Year 2004 documents that, as of 2003, the
Government of the People's Republic of China had deployed approximately
500 short-range ballistic missiles against Taiwan;
Whereas the escalating arms buildup of missiles and other offensive weapons by
the People's Republic of China in areas adjacent to the Taiwan Strait is
a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area;
Whereas given the recent positive developments in cross-strait relations,
including the Lunar New Year charter flights and new proposals for
cross-strait exchanges, it is particularly unfortunate that the National
People's Congress adopted this legislation;
Whereas since its enactment in 1979, the Taiwan Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 3301 et
seq.), which codified in law the basis for continued commercial,
cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States
and the people of Taiwan, has been instrumental in maintaining peace,
security, and stability in the Taiwan Strait;
Whereas section 2(b)(2) of the Taiwan Relations Act declares that ``peace and
stability in the area are in the political, security, and economic
interests of the United States, and are matters of international
concern'';
Whereas, at the time the Taiwan Relations Act was enacted into law, section
2(b)(3) of such Act made clear that the United States decision to
establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China
rested upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan would be
determined by peaceful means;
Whereas section 2(b)(4) of the Taiwan Relations Act declares it the policy of
the United States ``to consider any effort to determine the future of
Taiwan by other than peaceful means, including by boycotts or embargoes,
a threat to the peace and security of the Western Pacific area and of
grave concern to the United States'';
Whereas section 2(b)(6) of the Taiwan Relations Act declares it the policy of
the United States ``to maintain the capacity of the United States to
resist any resort to force or other forms of coercion that would
jeopardize the security, or the social or economic system, of the people
on Taiwan''; and
Whereas any attempt to determine Taiwan's future by other than peaceful means
and other than with the express consent of the people of Taiwan would be
considered of grave concern to the United States: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) the anti-secession law of the People's Republic of
China provides a legal justification for the use of force
against Taiwan, altering the status quo in the region, and thus
is of grave concern to the United States;
(2) the President of the United States should direct all
appropriate officials of the United States Government to
reflect the grave concern with which the United States views
the passage of China's anti-secession law in particular, and
the growing Chinese military threats to Taiwan in general, to
their counterpart officials in the Government of the People's
Republic of China;
(3) the Government of the United States should reaffirm its
policy that the future of Taiwan should be resolved by peaceful
means and with the consent of the people of Taiwan; and
(4) the Government of the United States should continue to
encourage dialogue between Taiwan and the People's Republic of
China.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
Mr. Smith (NJ) moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1527-1529)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Con. Res. 98.
At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1546)
Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 424 - 4 (Roll no. 81).(text: CR H1527-1528)
Roll Call #81 (House)On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 424 - 4 (Roll no. 81). (text: CR H1527-1528)
Roll Call #81 (House)Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.