Constitutional Amendment - Marriage Protection Amendment - Declares that: (1) marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman; and (2) neither the U.S. Constitution nor the constitution of any state shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents of marriage be conferred upon any other union.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 88 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. J. RES. 88
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
relating to marriage.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 6, 2006
Mrs. Musgrave (for herself, Mr. McIntyre, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Akin, Mr.
Alexander, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Barrett of South
Carolina, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Beauprez, Mr. Bishop of Georgia,
Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Brown of South
Carolina, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Carter,
Mr. Chabot, Mr. Chocola, Mr. Cole of Oklahoma, Mr. Conaway, Mrs. Cubin,
Mr. Culberson, Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia,
Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Mr. Deal of Georgia, Mr. Doolittle, Mrs. Drake,
Mr. Duncan, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. Everett, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Forbes, Ms.
Foxx, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Gingrey,
Mr. Goode, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Gutknecht, Mr. Hall, Ms. Harris, Mr.
Hayes, Mr. Hayworth, Mr. Herger, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Istook,
Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. King of
Iowa, Mr. Kuhl of New York, Mr. Lewis of Kentucky, Mr. Lucas, Mr.
Manzullo, Mr. Marchant, Mr. McCotter, Mr. McHenry, Mr. McKeon, Miss
McMorris, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. Gary G. Miller of California,
Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr.
Norwood, Mr. Nussle, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Pence, Mr. Peterson of
Pennsylvania, Mr. Pickering, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Rogers of
Alabama, Mr. Ryun of Kansas, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Shuster,
Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Sodrel, Mr. Souder,
Mr. Stearns, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, Mr.
Tiahrt, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr.
Whitfield, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) introduced the
following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States
relating to marriage.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:
``Article --
``Section 1. This article may be cited as the `Marriage Protection
Amendment'.
``Section 2. Marriage in the United States shall consist only of
the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the
constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage
or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than
the union of a man and a woman.''.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 918 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 88 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.
Rule H. Res. 918 passed House.
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 918. (consideration: CR H5297-5321)
Rule provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 88 with 1 hour and 30 minutes of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 918, the House proceeded with 90 minutes of general debate on H.J. Res. 88.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H5320)
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
Failed of passage/not agreed to in House: On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 236 - 187, 1 Present (Roll no. 378).(text: CR H5297)
Roll Call #378 (House)On passage Failed by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 236 - 187, 1 Present (Roll no. 378). (text: CR H5297)
Roll Call #378 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.