Amends the federal judicial code to add Flagstaff as a location where court will be held for the District of Arizona.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3589 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3589
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place
of holding court for the District of Arizona.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 28, 2005
Mr. Renzi introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide an additional place
of holding court for the District of Arizona.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds as follows:
(1) It is necessary for the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona to hold court in Flagstaff,
Arizona, in order to serve the citizens of northern Arizona.
(2) Since October 2001, there have been nearly 600 felony
cases arising in northern Arizona. Victims, witnesses, police
officers, Federal agents, friends, experts, evidence
custodians, and support personnel have had to travel hundreds
of miles to Phoenix or Prescott for grand jury, pretrial,
change of plea, and sentencing hearings.
(3) Holding court in Flagstaff would serve 12 Indian
reservations in northern Arizona, including the Navajo Nation,
which is the size of West Virginia. The murder rate there is 6
times the national average.
(4) Holding court in Flagstaff would be critical to the
presence of the National Park Service in northern Arizona. For
example, the Grand Canyon is located only 1 to 2 hours from
Flagstaff, while Phoenix is as much as 6 hours away.
(5) Changes in the Indian Self-Determination Act extended
Federal Tort Claims Act coverage to tribal organizations, which
has led to increased Federal civil actions arising in northern
Arizona. Holding court in Flagstaff would provide a convenient
forum for these cases.
(6) There is infrastructure in place in Flagstaff for a
Federal courthouse. Construction and other start-up costs would
be minimal.
(7) General demographics alone dictate a need for the
citizens of northern Arizona to have equal justice. The 5
northern Arizona counties encompass a vast area of 340 miles
east to west, and 200 miles north to south.
(8) More than 650,000 people live in northern Arizona.
(9) Northern Arizona accounts for 40 percent of all crimes
committed on Indian tribal land nationwide.
(10) Flagstaff is presently home to 9 Federal law
enforcement agencies: the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the Bureau of Indian
Affairs, the U.S. Marshals Service, the Forest Service, the
Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and
the U.S. Park Service.
SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL PLACE OF HOLDING COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA.
Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting
``Flagstaff,'' after ``held at''.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line