Declares that: (1) funding for English language learners provided by Arizona's 47th Legislature's Second Legislative Session is adequate; and (2) any failure of Arizona (or by any agency or subdivision of Arizona) to provide funding in excess of that amount is not a denial of equal educational opportunity under the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, and is not a basis for a civil action, or for relief, against Arizona (or any agency or subdivision).
Makes this Act applicable to litigation pending upon its enactment, including Flores v. Arizona.
[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5105 Introduced in House (IH)]
109th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5105
To clarify that Arizona is in compliance with the Equal Educational
Opportunities Act of 1974 with respect to English language learners.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 5, 2006
Mr. Hayworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined
by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as
fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To clarify that Arizona is in compliance with the Equal Educational
Opportunities Act of 1974 with respect to English language learners.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``_______ Act of 2006''.
SEC. 2. ARIZONA IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EQUAL EDUCATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES ACT OF 1974 WITH RESPECT TO ENGLISH
LANGUAGE LEARNERS.
(a) In General.--For purposes of the Equal Educational
Opportunities Act of 1974 (title II of Public Law 93-380; 20 U.S.C.
1701 et seq.)--
(1) the funding for English language learners provided
pursuant to Chapter Four of the State of Arizona's 47th
Legislature's Second Legislative Session is adequate; and
(2) any failure of Arizona (or by any agency or subdivision
of Arizona) to provide funding for English language learners in
excess of the funding referred to in paragraph (1)--
(A) is not a denial by Arizona (or by any agency or
subdivision of Arizona) of equal educational
opportunity for purposes of section 204(f) of that Act
(20 U.S.C. 1703(f)); and
(B) is not a basis for a civil action, or for
relief, against Arizona (or against any agency or
subdivision of Arizona) under section 207 of that Act
(20 U.S.C. 1706).
(b) Applicability to Current Litigation.--This Act applies to
litigation pending as of the date of the enactment of this Act,
including the litigation known as Flores v. Arizona.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Subcommittee on 21st Century Competitiveness.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line