Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should use its voice and vote at the United Nations to support the creation of a permanent United Nations Emergency Peace Service which should: (1) be able to act immediately in an emerging humanitarian crisis; and (2) be recruited from member nations with a single command structure able to provide an integrated service encompassing 12,000 to 18,000 civilian, police, judicial, military, and relief professionals.
[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 213 Introduced in House (IH)]
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 213
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a United
Nations Emergency Peace Service capable of intervening in the early
stages of a humanitarian crisis could save millions of lives, billions
of dollars, and is in the interests of the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 5, 2007
Mr. Wynn (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Payne, Mr. Walsh of New York,
Mr. Blumenauer, and Mr. Frank of Massachusetts) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a United
Nations Emergency Peace Service capable of intervening in the early
stages of a humanitarian crisis could save millions of lives, billions
of dollars, and is in the interests of the United States.
Whereas genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity have occurred in
Rwanda, Cambodia, the former Yugoslavia, East Timor, Sierra Leone, the
Democratic Republic of Congo, Uganda, Liberia, and elsewhere;
Whereas the United States Government has found that genocide, war crimes, and
crimes against humanity are occurring in the Darfur region of Sudan;
Whereas, at the September 2005 World Summit, the Member States of the United
Nations declared that the international community has a responsibility
to protect these populations when countries are unable or unwilling to
prevent genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity;
Whereas, at the 2005 World Summit, over 150 heads of state signed a document
which the United Nations General Assembly adopted, declaring that ``we
are prepared to take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner,
through the Security Council ... should peaceful means be inadequate and
national authorities manifestly fail to protect their populations from
genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity.'';
Whereas failed and failing states can become breeding grounds for terrorism,
crime, trafficking, humanitarian catastrophes, and other threats to the
United States;
Whereas the 2006 National Security Strategy clearly states that preventing
humanitarian disasters and strengthening fragile states is in the
national security interests of the United States;
Whereas numerous studies have shown that early intervention in humanitarian
crises could save millions of lives and billions of dollars;
Whereas the international community spent approximately $200,000,000,000 on
conflict management during the 1990s;
Whereas approximately $130,000,000,000 of that amount could have been saved
through a more effective preventive approach to conflict management;
Whereas the United Nations does not have a rapid deployment capacity to
intervene to avert humanitarian catastrophes;
Whereas there is a need for a United Nations Emergency Peace Service (UNEPS)
that could be rapidly deployed during the early stages of a humanitarian
crisis to save lives;
Whereas UNEPS could assist in the early implementation of peace accords by
providing a ready reserve corps that could be deployed immediately;
Whereas UNEPS would complement, but not replace, existing peace operations of
the United Nations, regional organizations, and national governments;
Whereas, if UNEPS had existed at the time that the Government of Sudan and the
rebels in Darfur signed the May 2006 Darfur Peace Agreement, UNEPS could
have been quickly deployed to cement peace before it unraveled and
prevented the loss and displacement of thousands of individuals;
Whereas, if ongoing ethnic and sectarian mass killings and crimes against
humanity continue to occur in Iraq and if the Iraqi Government does not
have the capacity to protect its citizens from these crimes, then all
members of the international community, should, through the United
Nations, exercise their mutual responsibility to protect the citizens of
Iraq;
Whereas, if the Security Council and the Iraqi Government identified the need
for a peacekeeping force to guarantee a negotiated agreement between
factions in Iraq and UNEPS existed, a UNEPS force could be quickly
deployed to seize the opportunity and help facilitate the implementation
of that agreement in advance of a traditional United Nations
peacekeeping force or as a surge capacity to buttress peacekeepers
already in place; and
Whereas UNEPS could be created for a start-up cost of $2,000,000,000 and annual
costs of less than $1,000,000,000: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that--
(1) the United States should use its voice, vote, and
influence at the United Nations to facilitate and support the
creation of a United Nations Emergency Peace Service (UNEPS);
and
(2) UNEPS--
(A) should be a permanent entity based at
designated sites of the United Nations, should include
mobile field headquarters, and should be able to act
immediately to address an emerging humanitarian crisis;
(B) should be comprised of individuals who are
recruited from United Nations Member States and who are
carefully selected, expertly trained, and coherently
organized;
(C) should be a dedicated service with a wide range
of professional skills within a single command
structure, prepared to conduct multiple functions in
diverse United Nations operations; and
(D) should be able to provide an integrated service
encompassing 12,000 to 18,000 civilian, police,
judicial, military, and relief professionals.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line