(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Requires the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to: (1) investigate without further delay alleged illegal conduct and violations of House rules by Representative William J. Jefferson; and (2) report its findings and recommendations to the House, including a recommendation regarding whether Representative Jefferson should be expelled from the House.
[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 452 Engrossed in House (EH)]
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
June 5, 2007.
Whereas clause one of House rule XXIII (Code of Official Conduct) states ``A
Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer or employee of the
House shall conduct himself at all times in a manner that shall reflect
creditably on the House.'';
Whereas on June 4, 2007, the United States Department of Justice filed an
indictment by a grand jury against the gentleman from Louisiana, the
Honorable William J. Jefferson, in the United States Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia;
Whereas in the aforementioned indictment of Representative Jefferson, the grand
jury specifies 16 counts, including but not limited to Solicitation of
Bribes by a Public Official, Violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices
Act, Money Laundering, Obstruction of Justice and Racketeering;
Whereas in the aforementioned indictment, the grand jury alleges that
Representative Jefferson did knowingly engage in an unlawful conspiracy
``to provide for the unjust enrichment of Defendant Jefferson and his
family members by corruptly seeking, soliciting, and directing that
things of value be paid to him and his family members in return for
Defendant Jefferson's performance of official acts'';
Whereas in the aforementioned indictment, the grand jury further alleges that
``Defendant sought to and, did conceal his and his family members'
expected or actual receipt of things of value by directing congressional
staff members, family members, and others to form nominee companies that
entered into business agreements to receive things of value sought by
Defendant Jefferson while not referencing him or disclosing his
involvement in obtaining the agreements'';
Whereas in the aforementioned indictment, the grand jury further alleges that
``Defendant Jefferson failed to disclose his and his family's financial
interests in these business ventures by omitting this material
information from travel and financial disclosure forms required to be
filed by the Rules of the House of Representatives and, in some cases,
by failing to make any of the required filings'';
Whereas in the aforementioned indictment, the grand jury further alleges that
``On or about July 30, 2005, in Arlington, Virginia, Defendant Jefferson
received $100,000 in cash from [cooperating witness]'' for use in an
illegal bribery scheme;
Whereas in the aforementioned indictment, the grand jury further alleges that
``On or before August 3, 2005, at his residence in Washington, DC,
Defendant Jefferson secreted in his freezer $90,000 of the $100,000 in
cash provided by [cooperating witness] as part of the front-end bribe to
Nigerian Official A, which was separated into $10,000 increments,
wrapped in aluminum foil, and concealed inside various frozen food
containers'';
Whereas on February 27, 2007, the House Democratic Caucus unanimously approved
the recommendation of House Democratic leaders that Representative
Jefferson be elected to the Committee on Homeland Security, a position
in which he would have had access to highly sensitive Top Secret
information concerning national security matters;
Whereas on June 5, 2007, Representative Jefferson resigned from the Committee on
Small Business to which he was elected by vote of the House on January
23, 2007;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States authorizes the House of
Representatives to ``determine the rules of its Proceedings, punish its
Members for disorderly behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two
thirds, expel a Member'';
Whereas the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is charged with enforcing
the Code of Official Conduct and related rules of the House governing
the Conduct of Members and staff;
Whereas during the 109th Congress, on May 17, 2006, the Committee on Standards
of Official Conduct issued a public statement which noted ``[t]he
Committee has voted to establish an investigative subcommittee to
conduct an inquiry regarding Representative William J. Jefferson'';
Whereas absent any subsequent public statements by the committee concerning
Representative Jefferson and in light of press accounts describing the
Jefferson inquiry as ``halted'' and ``stalled'' it is essential that the
House act to ensure that appropriate and timely action is taken to
complete the Jefferson inquiry and protect the integrity of the House;
Whereas clause 5(a)(4)(A) of House rule X states ``At the beginning of a
Congress, the Speaker or his designee and the Minority Leader or his
designee each shall name 10 Members, Delegates or the Resident
Commissioner from his respective party who are not members of the
Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to be available to serve on
investigative subcommittees of that committee during that Congress. The
names of Members, Delegates or the Resident Commissioner so named shall
be announced to the House.'';
Whereas Republican Leader Boehner, having chosen 10 Republican Members for the
ethics pool for the 110th Congress earlier this year and Speaker Pelosi
only having named the Democrat Members of the pool earlier today: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct is directed
to investigate without further delay alleged illegal conduct and violations of
House rules by Representative William J. Jefferson and report its findings and
recommendations to the House, including a recommendation regarding whether
Representative Jefferson should be expelled from the House.
Attest:
Clerk.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H5966-5971)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Res. 452.
The previous question was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H5971)
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H. Res. 452, the Chair put the question on adoption of the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Boehner demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the resolution until later in the legislative day.
Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5979-5980)
Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 373 - 26, 13 Present (Roll no. 430).(text: CR H5966-5967)
Roll Call #430 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 373 - 26, 13 Present (Roll no. 430). (text: CR H5966-5967)
Roll Call #430 (House)Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line