Expresses the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court should uphold laws that allow the families and friends of fallen members of the Armed Forces to mourn their loved ones in peace and privacy.
[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 261 Introduced in House (IH)]
111th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 261
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court should uphold
laws that allow the families and friends of fallen members of the Armed
Forces to mourn their loved ones in peace and privacy.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 15, 2010
Mr. Boccieri submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court should uphold
laws that allow the families and friends of fallen members of the Armed
Forces to mourn their loved ones in peace and privacy.
Whereas members of the Armed Forces who are killed in combat, die from wounds
incurred in combat, or otherwise die in the line of duty lay down the
ultimate sacrifice for the safety of the United States;
Whereas the families and friends of these brave men and women have the right to
mourn their loved ones in peace and privacy;
Whereas families at military funerals have been subject to offensive and
disruptive shouting and picketing that deprives them of that right;
Whereas the protestors of Westboro Baptist Church engage in offensive and
disruptive demonstrations at military funerals, holding signs that read,
``Thank God for Dead Soldiers'' and ``Soldiers Die God Laughs'';
Whereas 41 States have enacted laws that protect the peace and privacy of
grieving military families by shielding them from protestors at the
funerals and memorial services of their loved ones;
Whereas the 109th Congress passed, with overwhelming bipartisan support, the
Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act (Public Law 109-228), which
requires protestors to remain a respectful distance from a funeral or
memorial service at a cemetery under the control of the Federal
Government;
Whereas the Respect for America's Fallen Heroes Act reaffirmed the commitment of
the United States to honor those who have sacrificed their lives for the
safety of the people of the United States;
Whereas the Supreme Court announced on March 8, 2010, that they will review the
case Snyder v. Phelps, No. 09-751, in which the Court will decide
whether laws that limit the speech of protestors in order to protect the
peace and privacy of grieving military families may be upheld under the
First Amendment to the Constitution;
Whereas the Supreme Court, in National Archives and Records Administration v.
Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004), declared that ``family members have a
personal stake in honoring and mourning their dead and objecting to
unwarranted public exploitation that by intruding upon their own grief,
tends to degrade the rites and respect they seek to accord to the
deceased person who was once their own'';
Whereas the Supreme Court, in Hill v. Colorado, 530 U.S. 703 (2000), ruled that
limitations on speech may restrict the time, place, and manner of speech
to protect the public from confrontational and harassing conduct; and
Whereas a military funeral or memorial service is never the appropriate time or
place for protest, and protest at a military funeral or memorial service
is never an appropriate manner of exercising free speech: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of Congress that the Supreme Court should uphold
laws that allow the families and friends of fallen members of the Armed
Forces to mourn their loved ones in peace and privacy.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Courts and Competition Policy.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line