Save U.S. Manufacturing and Jobs Act - Removes duty-free or other preferential treatment eligibility under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) for certain imported sleeping bags.
[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5940 Introduced in House (IH)]
111th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5940
To remove preferential trade treatment for certain textile articles.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 29, 2010
Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To remove preferential trade treatment for certain textile articles.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Save U.S. Manufacturing and Jobs
Act''.
SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Congress should enact measures to save and create jobs
in the United States, which has suffered the worst recession
since World War II.
(2) United States production of certain sleeping bags is
under immediate threat due to preferential trade terms afforded
to foreign manufacturers under the Generalized System of
Preferences (GSP) program under the Trade Act of 1974.
(3) Certain sleeping bags imported from countries eligible
for duty-free trade benefits under the GSP program have
increased in a short period of time, from less than one percent
in 2009 to more than seven percent by April 2010, and will
continue to increase dramatically, given recent trends.
(4) The production of sleeping bags in the United States
supports a domestic supply chain of inputs and component parts.
(5) Sleeping bags made in beneficiary countries under the
GSP program are made almost entirely with Chinese components.
In most cases, the value of the sleeping bags is attributable
predominantly to components made in a third country,
particularly China. The sleeping bags are then assembled in
``free zones'', meaning that no duty is paid on the Chinese
fabrics and other raw materials entering those GSP beneficiary
countries. Conversely, United States manufacturers must pay
duty on any imported components. This creates an unfair
advantage for foreign manufacturers.
(6) Continuing preferential treatment for certain sleeping
bags will lead to the loss of domestic textile jobs during a
time of record unemployment.
(7) Congress determined that certain textile products and
other import sensitive items should not be provided
preferential trade treatment under the GSP program. Sleeping
bags are textile products, and, as such, should be exempt from
GSP.
(8) Reinstating the otherwise applicable most-favored-
nation (MFN) tariff rate for sleeping bags will level the
playing field for United States manufacturers.
SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN TEXTILE ARTICLES.
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any provision of title V of the
Trade Act of 1974 (relating to the generalized system of preferences),
no product classifiable under subheading 9404.30.80 of the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States is eligible for duty-free or other
preferential treatment under such title V.
(b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line