Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the conditions for the United States becoming a signatory to or negotiating any international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 945 Introduced in House (IH)]
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 945
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the
conditions for the United States becoming a signatory to or negotiating
any international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions under the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 3, 2009
Mr. Lamborn (for himself, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. McCotter, Ms. Foxx,
Mr. Latta, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Chaffetz, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr.
Harper, Mr. Pitts, Mrs. Lummis, Ms. Fallin, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr.
King of Iowa, Mr. Posey, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Barton of
Texas, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Bartlett, Mr.
Tiberi, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Cole, Mr. Garrett of New
Jersey, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, and Mr. Sensenbrenner) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign
Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the
conditions for the United States becoming a signatory to or negotiating
any international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions under the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Whereas the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, adopted in
May 1992, entered into force in 1994;
Whereas the 1997 Kyoto Protocol entered into force in 2005 without United States
ratification;
Whereas greenhouse gas emissions from many of the developed nation signatories
to the Kyoto Protocol have failed to decline since the treaty was signed
and indeed the emissions reduction performance of the United States as a
nonparty exceeds that of many parties;
Whereas greenhouse gas emissions from the developing nations exempted under
Kyoto have risen dramatically since 1997, especially those from China,
and are expected to continue growing at a pace seven times faster than
those of the United States and other developed nations in the decades
ahead;
Whereas studies have found high costs associated with Europe's attempt to reduce
emissions under Kyoto, and also predicted high costs had the United
States ratified and complied with its provisions;
Whereas the emissions reduction targets in Kyoto expire in 2012 and proponents
of successor treaty negotiations in Copenhagen have stated that post-
2012 targets need to be more stringent and therefore costlier than those
under Kyoto; and
Whereas proponents of a successor treaty at Copenhagen have expressed the need
to impose internationally binding, verifiable, and enforceable targets
on the United States, raising concerns about American sovereignty; Now,
therefore be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that--
(1) the United States should not be a signatory to any
protocol or other agreement regarding the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change of 1992, at negotiations
in Copenhagen in December 2009 or thereafter, which would--
(A) result in significant harm to the economy of
the United States; or
(B) compromise American sovereignty by requiring
the United States to submit to decisions of
international inspection, compliance, and enforcement
mechanisms; and
(2) the United States should demand in any such discussions
or negotiations that any protocol or agreement must not mandate
new commitments to limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions for
the United States and other Annex I Developed Country Parties
without binding, verifiable, and enforceable commitments to
limit or reduce greenhouse gas emissions for Developing Country
Parties within the same compliance period.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line