Regulatory Accountability Act of 2011 - (Sec. 2) Defines "major rule" and "major guidance" for purposes of this Act as a rule or guidance that is likely to impose: (1) an annual cost on the economy of $100 million or more, adjusted annually for inflation; (2) a major increase in costs or prices; (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S. enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises; or (4) significant impacts on multiple sectors of the economy. Defines "high-impact rule" as a rule that is likely to have an annual cost on the economy of $1 billion or more, adjusted annually for inflation.
(Sec. 3) Revises procedures for rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to require a federal agency, in the rulemaking process, to make all preliminary and final factual determinations based on evidence and to consider: (1) the legal authority under which a rule may be proposed, (2) the specific nature and significance of the problem the agency may address with a rule, (3) whether existing rules have created or contributed to the problem the agency may address with a rule and whether such rules may be amended or rescinded, (4) any reasonable alternatives for a new rule, and (5) the potential costs and benefits associated with potential alternative rules.
Revises rulemaking notice requirements to require an agency to: (1) publish in the Federal Register advance notice of proposed rulemaking involving a major or high-impact rule that involves a novel legal or policy issue arising out of statutory mandates; (2) consult with the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before issuing a proposed rule and after the issuance of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking; (3) provide interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process; (4) hold a hearing before the adoption of any high-impact rule; (5) expand requirements for the adoption of a final rule, including requiring that the agency adopt a rule only on the basis of the best evidence and at the least cost; and (6) grant any interested person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule. Specifies the minimum amount of information that must be included in an advance notice.
Requires the Administrator to issue guidelines to promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization of agency rules during the rulemaking process
Exempts from such revised procedures rulemakings that concern monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee.
(Sec. 4) Imposes new requirements for issuing any major guidance or guidance that involves a novel legal or policy issue arising out of statutory mandates. Authorizes the Administrator to issue guidelines for agencies in issuing major guidance or other guidance.
(Sec. 5) Provides for electronic access to transcripts of testimony and exhibits and other papers filed in a rulemaking proceeding.
Requires the record of decision in a rulemaking proceeding to include information from a hearing under the Information Quality Act or on a high-impact rule.
Requires an agency to grant a petition for a hearing in the case of a major rule, unless the agency reasonably determines that a hearing would not advance consideration of the rule or would unreasonably delay completion of the rulemaking. Exempts from this requirement rulemakings that concern monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee.
(Sec. 6) Provides that an agency's denial of an Information Quality Act petition, or a failure to grant or deny such petition within 90 days, is reviewable by a court as a final action. Allows immediate judicial review of interim rules, other than in cases involving national security interests, issued without compliance with the notice requirements of this Act.
(Sec. 7) Revises standards for the scope of judicial review of agency rulemaking to prohibit a court from deferring to an agency's: (1) interpretation of a rule if the agency did not comply with APA requirements, (2) determination of the costs and benefits or other economic or risk assessment if the agency failed to conform to guidelines on such determinations and assessments established by the Administrator, (3) determinations made in the adoption of an interim rule, or (4) guidance.
(Sec. 8) Defines "substantial evidence" for purposes of evaluating agency adjudications and for rulemaking under APA as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion in light of the record considered as a whole, taking into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence relied upon by the agency to support its decision.
(Sec. 9) Provides that the amendments made by this Act to specified provisions of federal law shall not apply to any rule makings pending or completed on the enactment date of this Act.
[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3010 Introduced in House (IH)]
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3010
To reform the process by which Federal agencies analyze and formulate
new regulations and guidance documents.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 22, 2011
Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Coble, and Mr. Peterson)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To reform the process by which Federal agencies analyze and formulate
new regulations and guidance documents.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Regulatory Accountability Act of
2011''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
Section 551 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (13), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (14), by striking the period at the end
and inserting a semicolon; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(15) `major rule' means any rule that the Administrator
of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs determines
is likely to impose--
``(A) an annual cost on the economy of $100,000,000
or more, adjusted annually for inflation;
``(B) a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State,
local, or tribal government agencies, or geographic
regions;
``(C) significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets; or
``(D) significant costs on multiple sectors of the
economy;
``(16) `high-impact rule' means any rule that the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs determines is likely to impose an annual cost on the
economy of $1,000,000,000 or more, adjusted annually for
inflation;
``(17) `guidance' means an agency statement of general
applicability and future effect, other than a regulatory
action, that sets forth a policy on a statutory, regulatory or
technical issue or an interpretation of a statutory or
regulatory issue;
``(18) `major guidance' means guidance that the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs finds is likely to lead to--
``(A) an annual cost on the economy of $100,000,000
or more, adjusted annually for inflation;
``(B) a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, local
or tribal government agencies, or geographic regions;
``(C) significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on
the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and
export markets; or
``(D) significant costs for multiple sectors of the
economy;
``(19) the `Information Quality Act' means section 515 of
Public Law 106-554, the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001, and guidelines issued
by the Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs or other agencies pursuant to the Act; and
``(20) the `Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs'
means the office established under section 3503 of chapter 35
of title 44 and any successor to that office.''.
SEC. 3. RULEMAKING.
(a) Section 553(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``(a) This section applies'' and inserting ``(a)
Applicability.--This section applies''.
(b) Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by
striking subsections (b) through (e) and inserting the following:
``(b) Rule Making Considerations.--In a rule making, an agency
shall make all preliminary and final determinations based on evidence
and consider, in addition to other applicable considerations, the
following:
``(1) The legal authority under which a rule may be
proposed, including whether a rule making is required by
statute, and if so, whether by a specific date, or whether the
agency has discretion to commence a rule making.
``(2) Other statutory considerations applicable to whether
the agency can or should propose a rule or undertake other
agency action.
``(3) The specific nature and significance of the problem
the agency may address with a rule (including the degree and
nature of risks the problem poses and the priority of
addressing those risks compared to other matters or activities
within the agency's jurisdiction), whether the problem warrants
new agency action, and the countervailing risks that may be
posed by alternatives for new agency action.
``(4) Whether existing rules have created or contributed to
the problem the agency may address with a rule and whether
those rules could be amended or rescinded to address the
problem in whole or part.
``(5) Any reasonable alternatives for a new rule or other
response identified by the agency or interested persons,
including not only responses that mandate particular conduct or
manners of compliance, but also--
``(A) the alternative of no Federal response;
``(B) amending or rescinding existing rules;
``(C) potential regional, State, local, or tribal
regulatory action or other responses that could be
taken in lieu of agency action; and
``(D) potential responses that--
``(i) specify performance objectives rather
than conduct or manners of compliance;
``(ii) establish economic incentives to
encourage desired behavior;
``(iii) provide information upon which
choices can be made by the public; or
``(iv) incorporate other innovative
alternatives rather than agency actions that
specify conduct or manners of compliance.
``(6) Notwithstanding any other provision of law--
``(A) the potential costs and benefits associated
with potential alternative rules and other responses
considered under section 553(b)(5), including direct,
indirect, and cumulative costs and benefits and
estimated impacts on jobs, economic growth, innovation,
and economic competitiveness;
``(B) means to increase the cost-effectiveness of
any Federal response; and
``(C) incentives for innovation, consistency,
predictability, lower costs of enforcement and
compliance (to government entities, regulated entities,
and the public), and flexibility.
``(c) Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Making for Major Rules and
High-Impact Rules.--
``(1) In the case of a rule making for a major rule or
high-impact rule, not later than 90 days before a notice of
proposed rule making is published in the Federal Register, an
agency shall publish advance notice of proposed rule making in
the Federal Register. In publishing such advance notice, the
agency shall--
``(A) include a written statement identifying, at a
minimum--
``(i) the nature and significance of the
problem the agency may address with a rule,
including data and other evidence and
information on which the agency expects to rely
for the proposed rule;
``(ii) the legal authority under which a
rule may be proposed, including whether a rule
making is required by statute, and if so,
whether by a specific date, or whether the
agency has discretion to commence a rule
making; and
``(iii) preliminary information available
to the agency concerning the other
considerations specified in subsection (b);
``(B) solicit written data, views or argument from
interested persons concerning the information and
issues addressed in the advance notice; and
``(C) provide for a period of not fewer than 60
days for interested persons to submit such written
data, views, or argument to the agency.
``(d) Notices of Proposed Rule Making; Determinations of Other
Agency Course.--Following completion of procedures under subsection
(c), if applicable, and consultation with the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, the agency shall publish
either a notice of proposed rule making or a determination of other
agency course, in accordance with the following:
``(1) A notice of proposed rule making shall include--
``(A) a statement of the time, place, and nature of
public rule making proceedings;
``(B) reference to the legal authority under which
the rule is proposed;
``(C) the terms of the proposed rule;
``(D) a description of information known to the
agency on the subject and issues of the proposed rule,
including but not limited to--
``(i) a summary of information known to the
agency concerning the considerations specified
in subsection (b);
``(ii) a summary of additional information
the agency provided to and obtained from
interested persons under subsection (c); and
``(iii) information specifically
identifying all data, studies, models, and
other evidence or information considered or
used by the agency in connection with its
determination to propose the rule;
``(E)(i) a reasoned preliminary determination of
need for the rule based on the information described
under subparagraph (D); and
``(ii) an additional statement of whether a rule is
required by statute;
``(F) a reasoned preliminary determination that the
benefits of the proposed rule meet the relevant
statutory objectives and justify the costs of the
proposed rule (including all costs to be considered
under subsection (b)(6)), based on the information
described under subparagraph (D);
``(G) a discussion of--
``(i) the alternatives to the proposed
rule, and other alternative responses,
considered by the agency under subsection (b);
``(ii) the costs and benefits of those
alternatives (including all costs to be
considered under subsection (b)(6));
``(iii) whether those alternatives meet
relevant statutory objectives; and
``(iv) why the agency did not propose any
of those alternatives; and
``(H)(i) a statement of whether existing rules have
created or contributed to the problem the agency seeks
to address with the proposed rule; and
``(ii) if so, whether or not the agency proposes to
amend or rescind any such rules, and why.
All information considered by the agency, and steps to
obtain information by the agency, in connection with
its determination to propose the rule, including all
information described by the agency under subparagraph
(D) and, at the discretion of the President or the
Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, information provided by that Office
in consultations with the agency, shall be placed in
the docket for the proposed rule and made accessible to
the public for the public's use when the notice of
proposed rule making is published.
``(2)(A) A notice of determination of other agency course
shall include a description of the alternative response the
agency determined to adopt.
``(B) If in its determination of other agency course the
agency makes a determination to amend or rescind an existing
rule, the agency need not undertake additional proceedings
under subsection (c) before it publishes a notice of proposed
rule making to amend or rescind the existing rule.
All information considered by the agency, and steps to obtain
information by the agency, in connection with its determination
of other agency course, including but not limited to all
information that would be required to be described by the
agency under paragraph (1)(D) if the agency had determined to
publish a notice of proposed rule making and, at the discretion
of the President or the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, information provided by
that Office in consultations with the agency, shall be placed
in the docket for the determination and made accessible to the
public for the public's use when the notice of determination is
published.
``(3) After notice of proposed rule making required by this
section, the agency shall provide interested persons an
opportunity to participate in the rule making through
submission of written data, views, or arguments with or without
opportunity for oral presentation, except that--
``(A) if a hearing is required under paragraph
(4)(B) or subsection (e), opportunity for oral
presentation shall be provided pursuant to that
requirement; or
``(B) when other than under subsection (e) of this
section rules are required by statute or at the
discretion of the agency to be made on the record after
opportunity for an agency hearing, sections 556 and 557
shall apply, and paragraph (4), requirements of
subsection (e) to receive comment outside of the
procedures of sections 556 and 557, and the petition
procedures of subsection (e)(6) shall not apply.
The agency shall provide not fewer than 90 days for interested
persons to submit written data, views, or argument (or 120 days
in the case of a proposed major or high-impact rule).
``(4)(A) Within 30 days of publication of notice of
proposed rulemaking, a member of the public may petition for a
hearing in accordance with section 556 to determine whether any
evidence or other information upon which the agency bases the
proposed rule fails to comply with of the Information Quality
Act.
``(B)(i) The agency may, upon review of the petition,
determine without further process to exclude from the rule
making the evidence or other information that is the subject of
the petition and, if appropriate, withdraw the proposed rule.
The agency shall promptly publish any such determination.
``(ii) If the agency does not resolve the petition under
the procedures of clause (i), it shall grant any such petition
that presents a prima facie case that evidence or other
information upon which the agency bases the proposed rule fails
to comply with the Information Quality Act, hold the requested
hearing not later than 30 days after receipt of the petition,
provide a reasonable opportunity for cross-examination at the
hearing, and decide the issues presented by the petition not
later than 60 days after receipt of the petition. The agency
may deny any petition that it determines does not present such
a prima facie case.
``(C) There shall be no judicial review of the agency's
disposition of issues considered and decided or determined
under subparagraph (B)(ii) until judicial review of the
agency's final action. There shall be no judicial review of an
agency's determination to withdraw a proposed rule under
subparagraph (B)(i).
``(D) Failure to petition for a hearing under this
paragraph shall not preclude judicial review of any claim based
on the Information Quality Act under chapter 7 of this title.
``(e) Hearings for High-Impact Rules.--Following notice of a
proposed rule making, receipt of comments on the proposed rule, and any
hearing held under subsection (d)(4), and before adoption of any high-
impact rule, the agency shall hold a hearing in accordance with
sections 556 and 557, unless such hearing is waived by all participants
in the rulemaking other than the agency. The agency shall provide a
reasonable opportunity for cross-examination at such hearing. The
hearing shall be limited to the following issues of fact, except that
participants at the hearing other than the agency may waive
determination of any such issue:
``(1) Whether the agency's asserted factual predicate for
the rule is supported by the evidence.
``(2) Whether there is an alternative to the proposed rule
that would achieve the relevant statutory objectives at a lower
cost (including all costs to be considered under subsection
(b)(6)) than the proposed rule.
``(3) If there is more than one alternative to the proposed
rule that would achieve the relevant statutory objectives at a
lower cost than the proposed rule, which alternative would
achieve the relevant statutory objectives at the lowest cost.
``(4) Whether, if the agency proposes to adopt a rule that
is more costly than the least costly alternative that would
achieve the relevant statutory objectives (including all costs
to be considered under subsection (b)(6)), the additional
benefits of the more costly rule exceed the additional costs of
the more costly rule.
``(5) Whether the evidence and other information upon which
the agency bases the proposed rule meets the requirements of
the Information Quality Act.
``(6) Upon petition by an interested person who has
participated in the rulemaking, other issues relevant to the
rule making, unless the agency determines that consideration of
the issues at the hearing would not advance consideration of
the rule or would, in light of the nature of the need for
agency action, unreasonably delay completion of the rule
making. An agency shall grant or deny a petition under this
paragraph within 30 days of its receipt of the petition.
No later than 45 days before any hearing held under this subsection or
sections 556 and 557, the agency shall publish in the Federal Register
a notice specifying the proposed rule to be considered at such hearing,
the issues to be considered at the hearing, and the time and place for
such hearing, except that such notice may be issued not later than 15
days before a hearing held under subsection (d)(4)(B).
``(f) Final Rules.--(1) The agency shall adopt a rule only
following consultation with the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs to facilitate compliance with
applicable rule making requirements.
``(2) The agency shall adopt a rule only on the basis of the best
reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, economic, and other
evidence and information concerning the need for, consequences of, and
alternatives to the rule.
``(3)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the agency shall
adopt the least costly rule considered during the rule making
(including all costs to be considered under subsection (b)(6)) that
meets relevant statutory objectives.
``(B) The agency may adopt a rule that is more costly than the
least costly alternative that would achieve the relevant statutory
objectives only if the additional benefits of the more costly rule
justify its additional costs and only if the agency explains its reason
for doing so based on interests of public health, safety or welfare
that are clearly within the scope of the statutory provision
authorizing the rule.
``(4) When it adopts a final rule, the agency shall publish a
notice of final rule making. The notice shall include--
``(A) a concise, general statement of the rule's basis and
purpose;
``(B) the agency's reasoned final determination of need for
a rule to address the problem the agency seeks to address with
the rule, including a statement of whether a rule is required
by statute;
``(C) the agency's reasoned final determination that the
benefits of the rule meet the relevant statutory objectives and
justify the rule's costs (including all costs to be considered
under subsection (b)(6));
``(D) the agency's reasoned final determination not to
adopt any of the alternatives to the proposed rule considered
by the agency during the rule making, including--
``(i) the agency's reasoned final determination
that no alternative considered achieved the relevant
statutory objectives with lower costs (including all
costs to be considered under subsection (b)(6)) than
the rule; or
``(ii) the agency's reasoned determination that its
adoption of a more costly rule complies with subsection
(f)(3)(B);
``(E) the agency's reasoned final determination--
``(i) that existing rules have not created or
contributed to the problem the agency seeks to address
with the rule; or
``(ii) that existing rules have created or
contributed to the problem the agency seeks to address
with the rule, and, if so--
``(I) why amendment or rescission of such
existing rules is not alone sufficient to
respond to the problem; and
``(II) whether and how the agency intends
to amend or rescind the existing rule separate
from adoption of the rule;
``(F) the agency's reasoned final determination that the
evidence and other information upon which the agency bases the
rule complies with the Information Quality Act; and
``(G)(i) for any major rule or high-impact rule, the
agency's plan for review of the rule no less than every ten
years to determine whether, based upon evidence, there remains
a need for the rule, whether the rule is in fact achieving
statutory objectives, whether the rule's benefits continue to
justify its costs, and whether the rule can be modified or
rescinded to reduce costs while continuing to achieve statutory
objectives;
``(ii) review of a rule under a plan required by clause (i)
of this subparagraph shall take into account the factors and
criteria set forth in subsections (b) through (f) of section
553 of this title.
All information considered by the agency in connection with its
adoption of the rule, and, at the discretion of the President
or the Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, information provided by that Office in
consultations with the agency, shall be placed in the docket
for the rule and made accessible to the public for the public's
use no later than when the rule is adopted.
``(g) Exceptions From Notice and Hearing Requirements.--(1) Except
when notice or hearing is required by statute, subsections (c) through
(e) of this section do not apply to interpretive rules, general
statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or
practice.
``(2)(A) When the agency for good cause, based upon evidence, finds
(and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor
in the rules issued) that compliance with subsection (c), (d), or (e)
or requirements to render final determinations under subsection (f) of
this section before the issuance of an interim rule is impracticable or
contrary to the public interest, including interests of national
security, such subsections or requirements to render final
determinations shall not apply to the agency's adoption of an interim
rule.
``(B) If, following compliance with subparagraph (A) of this
paragraph, the agency adopts an interim rule, it shall commence
proceedings that comply fully with subsections (c) through (f) of this
section immediately upon publication of the interim rule. No less than
270 days from publication of the interim rule (or 18 months in the case
of a major rule or high-impact rule), the agency shall complete rule
making under subsections (c) through (f) of this subsection and take
final action to adopt a final rule or rescind the interim rule. If the
agency fails to take timely final action, the interim rule will cease
to have the effect of law.
``(C) Other than in cases involving interests of national security,
upon the agency's publication of an interim rule without compliance
with subsections (c), (d), or (e) or requirements to render final
determinations under subsection (f) of this section, an interested
party may seek immediate judicial review under chapter 7 of this title
of the agency's determination to adopt such interim rule. The record on
such review shall include all documents and information considered by
the agency and any additional information presented by a party that the
court determines necessary to consider to assure justice.
``(h) Additional Requirements for Hearings.--When a hearing is
required under subsection (e) or is otherwise required by statute or at
the agency's discretion before adoption of a rule, the agency shall
comply with the requirements of sections 556 and 557 in addition to the
requirements of subsection (f) in adopting the rule and in providing
notice of the rule's adoption.
``(i) Date of Publication of Rule.--The required publication or
service of a substantive final or interim rule shall be made not less
than 30 days before the effective date of the rule, except--
``(1) a substantive rule which grants or recognizes an
exemption or relieves a restriction;
``(2) interpretive rules and statements of policy; or
``(3) as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule.
``(j) Right To Petition.--Each agency shall give an interested
person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of
a rule.
``(k) Rule Making Guidelines.--(1)(A) The Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs shall have authority to
establish guidelines for the assessment, including quantitative and
qualitative assessment, of the costs and benefits of potential,
proposed, and final rules and other economic issues or issues related
to risk that are relevant to rule making under this section and other
sections of this title. The rigor of cost-benefit analysis required by
such guidelines shall be commensurate, in the Administrator's
determination, with the economic impact of the rule.
``(B) To ensure that agencies use the best available techniques to
quantify and evaluate anticipated present and future benefits, costs,
other economic issues, and risks as accurately as possible, the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs shall
regularly update guidelines established under paragraph (1)(A) of this
subsection.
``(2) The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs shall also have authority to issue guidelines to promote
coordination, simplification and harmonization of agency rules during
the rule making process and otherwise. Such guidelines shall assure
that each agency avoids regulations that are inconsistent or
incompatible with, or duplicative of, its other regulations and those
of other Federal agencies and drafts its regulations to be simple and
easy to understand, with the goal of minimizing the potential for
uncertainty and litigation arising from such uncertainty.
``(3) To ensure consistency in Federal rule making, the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
shall--
``(A) issue guidelines and otherwise take action to ensure
that rule makings conducted in whole or in part under
procedures specified in provisions of law other than those of
subchapter II of this title conform to the fullest extent
allowed by law with the procedures set forth in section 553 of
this title; and
``(B) issue guidelines for the conduct of hearings under
subsections 553(d)(4) and 553(e) of this section, including to
assure a reasonable opportunity for cross-examination. Each
agency shall adopt regulations for the conduct of hearings
consistent with the guidelines issued under this subparagraph.
``(4) The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs shall issue guidelines pursuant to the Information Quality Act
to apply in rule making proceedings under sections 553, 556 and 557 of
this title. In all cases, such guidelines, and the Administrator's
specific determinations regarding agency compliance with such
guidelines, shall be entitled to judicial deference.
``(l) Inclusion in the Record of Certain Documents and
Information.--The agency shall include in the record for a rule making
all documents and information considered by the agency during the
proceeding, including, at the discretion of the President or the
Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
documents and information communicated by that Office during
consultation with the Agency.
``(m) Monetary Policy Exemption.--Nothing in subsection (b)(6),
subparagraphs (F) and (G) of subsection (d)(1), subsection (e),
subsection (f)(3), and subparagraphs (C) and (D) of subsection (f)(5)
shall apply to rule makings that concern monetary policy proposed or
implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or
the Federal Open Market Committee.''.
SEC. 4. AGENCY GUIDANCE; PROCEDURES TO ISSUE MAJOR GUIDANCE;
PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO ISSUE GUIDELINES FOR ISSUANCE
OF GUIDANCE.
(a) In General.--Chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, is
amended by inserting after section 553 the following new section:
``Sec. 553a. Agency guidance; procedures to issue major guidance;
authority to issue guidelines for issuance of guidance
``(a) Before issuing any major guidance, an agency shall--
``(1) make and document a reasoned determination that--
``(A) assures that such guidance is understandable
and complies with relevant statutory objectives and
regulatory provisions;
``(B) identifies the costs and benefits (including
all costs to be considered during the rule making under
section 553(b) of this title) of conduct conforming to
such guidance and assures that such benefits justify
such costs; and
``(C) describes alternatives to such guidance and
their costs and benefits (including all costs to be
considered during rule making under section 553(b) of
this title) and explains why the agency rejected those
alternatives; and
``(2) confer with the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs on the issuance of such
guidance to assure that the guidance is reasonable,
understandable, consistent with relevant statutory and
regulatory provisions and requirements or practices of other
agencies, does not produce costs that are unjustified by the
guidance's benefits, and is otherwise appropriate.
``(b) Agency guidance--
``(1) is not legally binding and may not be relied upon by
an agency as legal grounds for agency action;
``(2) shall state in a plain, prominent and permanent
manner that it is not legally binding; and
``(3) shall, at the time it is issued or upon request, be
made available by the issuing agency to interested persons and
the public.
``(c) The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs shall have authority to issue guidelines for use by the
agencies in the issuance of major guidance and other guidance. Such
guidelines shall assure that each agency avoids issuing guidance
documents that are inconsistent or incompatible with, or duplicative
of, with its other regulations and those of other Federal agencies and
drafts its guidance documents to be simple and easy to understand, with
the goal of minimizing the potential for uncertainty and litigation
arising from such uncertainty.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 5 of
title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item
relating to section 553 the following new item:
``553a. Agency guidance; procedures to issue major guidance;
presidential authority to issue guidelines
for issuance of guidance.''.
SEC. 5. HEARINGS; PRESIDING EMPLOYEES; POWERS AND DUTIES; BURDEN OF
PROOF; EVIDENCE; RECORD AS BASIS OF DECISION.
Section 556 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking
subsection (e) and inserting the following:
``(e)(1) The transcript of testimony and exhibits, together with
all papers and requests filed in the proceeding, constitutes the
exclusive record for decision in accordance with section 557 and, on
payment of lawfully prescribed costs, shall be made available to the
parties. When an agency decision rests on official notice of a material
fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, a party is entitled,
on timely request, to an opportunity to show the contrary.
``(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) of this subsection, in a
proceeding held under this section pursuant to section 553(d)(4) or
553(e), the record for decision shall include any information that is
part of the record of proceedings under section 553.
``(f) When an agency conducts rule making under this section and
section 557 directly after concluding proceedings upon an advance
notice of proposed rulemaking under section 553(c), the matters to be
considered and determinations to be made shall include, among other
relevant matters and determinations, the matters and determinations
described in subsections (b) and (f) of section 553.
``(g) Upon receipt of a petition for a hearing under this section,
the agency shall grant the petition in the case of any major rule,
unless the agency reasonably determines that a hearing would not
advance consideration of the rule or would, in light of the need for
agency action, unreasonably delay completion of the rule making. The
agency shall publish its decision to grant or deny the petition when it
renders the decision, including an explanation of the grounds for
decision. The information contained in the petition shall in all cases
be included in the administrative record. This subsection shall not
apply to rule makings that concern monetary policy proposed or
implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or
the Federal Open Market Committee.''.
SEC. 6. ACTIONS REVIEWABLE.
Section 704 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``Agency action made'' and inserting ``(a)
Agency action made''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following:
``(b) Other than in cases involving interests of national security,
notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, upon the agency's
publication of an interim rule without compliance with section 553 (c),
(d), or (e) or requirements to render final determinations under
subsection (f) of section 553, an interested party may seek immediate
judicial review under this chapter of the agency's determination to
adopt such rule on an interim basis. Review shall be limited to whether
the agency abused its discretion to adopt the interim rule without
compliance with section 553 (c), (d), or (e) or without rendering final
determinations under subsection (f) of section 553.''.
SEC. 7. SCOPE OF REVIEW.
Section 706 of title 5, United States Code is amended--
(1) by striking ``To the extent necessary'' and inserting
``(a) To the extent necessary'';
(2) in paragraph (2)(A) of subsection (a) (as redesignated
by paragraph (1) of this section), by inserting after ``in
accordance with law'' the following: ``(including the
Information Quality Act)''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(b) The court shall not defer to the agency's--
``(1) interpretation of an agency rule if the agency did
not comply with the procedures of section 553 or sections 556-
557 of chapter 5 of this title to issue the interpretation;
``(2) determination of the costs and benefits or other
economic or risk assessment of the action, if the agency failed
to conform to guidelines on such determinations and assessments
established by the Administrator of the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs under section 553(k); or
``(3) determinations under interlocutory review pursuant to
sections 553(g)(2)(C) and 704(b).
``(c) The court shall review agency denials of petitions under
section 553(e)(6) or any other petition for a hearing under sections
556 and 557 for abuse of agency discretion.''.
SEC. 8. ADDED DEFINITION.
Section 701(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'';
(2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end,
and inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) `substantial evidence' means such relevant evidence
as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a
conclusion in light of the record considered as a whole, taking
into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from the
weight of the evidence relied upon by the agency to support its
decision.''.
SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.
The amendments made by this Act to--
(1) sections 553, 556, and 704 of title 5, United States
Code;
(2) subsection (b) of section 701 of such title;
(3) paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 706(b) of such title;
and
(4) subsection (c) of section 706 of such title;
shall not apply to any rule makings pending or completed on the date of
enactment of this Act.
<all>
DEBATE - Pursuant to the the provisions of H.Res. 477, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Olson amendment.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the the provisions of H.Res. 477, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 3.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the the provisions of H.Res. 477, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly (VA) amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the the provisions of H.Res. 477, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler amendment.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Smith (TX) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
DEBATE - Pursuant to the the provisions of H.Res. 477, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 7.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 7, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 3010.
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of committee amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H8088-8092)
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H8103)
Mr. Boswell moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H8103-8105; text: CR H8103)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Boswell motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment that stipulates the provisions in this Act shall not apply to new regulations or the revision of existing regulations that reduce costs or increase coverage for pharmaceuticals and other health services for seniors, or efforts by the Secretaries of Health and Human Services, Veterans Administration, and Defense to negotiate lower prescription drug prices.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H8104)
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 186 - 233 (Roll no. 887). (consideration: CR H8105)
Roll Call #887 (House)Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 253 - 167 (Roll no. 888).
Roll Call #888 (House)On passage Passed by recorded vote: 253 - 167 (Roll no. 888).
Roll Call #888 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.