Expresses the sense of Congress that the President should seek through negotiated agreements under the auspices of the World Trade Organization (WTO) the elimination of all direct and indirect subsidies benefitting the production or export of sugar by any foreign country that: (1) exported more than 200,000 metric tons of sugar during 2013, or (2) has in effect a free trade agreement with the United States.
Urges the President to: (1) report to Congress detailed information about how any of such countries has eliminated such subsidies, and (2) then propose legislation to implement a "zero for zero" sugar subsidy policy.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 39 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 39
Expressing the sense of Congress that all direct and indirect subsidies
that benefit the production or export of sugar by all major sugar
producing and consuming countries should be eliminated.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 14, 2013
Mr. Yoho (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Cassidy, Mr.
LaMalfa, Ms. Frankel of Florida, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Radel, Mr. Schrader,
Mrs. Roby, and Ms. Wilson of Florida) submitted the following
concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and
Means, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to
be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that all direct and indirect subsidies
that benefit the production or export of sugar by all major sugar
producing and consuming countries should be eliminated.
Whereas every major sugar-producing and sugar-consuming country in the world
maintains some form of direct or indirect subsidy to support its sugar
growers, processors, or consumers;
Whereas virtually all of the more than 100 countries that produce sugar maintain
market distorting subsidy programs, including--
(1) the Government of Brazil which has direct and indirect subsidies of
at least $2,500,000,000 per year for programs to promote its sugar and
ethanol industry and a subsidized credit program making available over
$2,000,000,000 to growers to replant sugarcane; and
(2) the Government of Mexico which has direct and indirect subsidies to
keep open 9 government-owned sugar mills accounting for 22 percent of
Mexican sugar production and direct payments to sugarcane growers;
Whereas the world sugar market is the most volatile commodity market in the
world;
Whereas the foregoing clauses provide ample evidence there is no undistorted,
free market in sugar in the world today; and
Whereas if such a free market did exist, United States sugar farmers and
processors could compete effectively in that market: Now, therefore, be
it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the President, by agreements negotiated under the
auspices of the World Trade Organization, should seek
elimination of all direct and indirect subsidies benefitting
the production or export of sugar by the government of--
(A) each country that exported more than 200,000
metric tons of sugar during 2013; and
(B) any other country with which the United States
has in effect a free trade agreement;
(2) if the President determines that all such subsidies by
all such countries have been eliminated, then the President
should report to Congress detailed information about how each
of the countries has eliminated such subsidies; and
(3) after submitting such report, the President should
propose to Congress legislation to implement a ``zero for
zero'' sugar subsidy policy.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line