Achieving Less Excess in Regulation and Requiring Transparency Act of 2014 or the ALERRT Act of 2014 - Title I: All Economic Regulations Are Transparent Act - All Economic Regulations are Transparent Act of 2014 or the ALERT Act of 2014 - (Sec. 102) Requires the head of each federal agency to submit a monthly report to the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each rule such agency expects to propose or finalize during the following year. Sets forth the required content of such reports, including: (1) a summary of the nature of the rule, (2) the objectives of and legal basis for issuance of the rule, (3) the stage of the rulemaking as of the date of submission, and (4) whether the rule is subject to periodic review as a rule with a significant economic impact.
Requires each agency head to submit a monthly report for any rule expected to be finalized during the following year for which the agency has issued a general notice of proposed rulemaking. Requires such reports to include an approximate schedule for completing action on the rule and an estimate of its cost and economic effects.
Requires the Administrator to make such monthly reports publicly available on the Internet.
Requires the Administrator to publish, not later than October 1 of each year, in the Federal Register: (1) information that the Administrator receives from each agency under this Act; (2) the number of rules and a list of each such rule that was proposed by each agency and each rule that was finalized by each agency; (3) the number of agency actions that repealed a rule, reduced the scope or cost of a rule, or accelerated the expiration date of a rule; (4) the total cost of all rules proposed or finalized; and (5) the number of rules for which an estimate of the cost of the rule was not available.
Requires the Administrator to make publicly available on the Internet, not later than October 1 of each year: (1) the analysis of the costs or benefits of each proposed or final rule issued by an agency for the previous year, (2) the docket number and regulation identifier number for each such rule, (3) the number of rules reviewed by OMB for the previous year, (4) the number of rules for which a review by the head of an agency was completed, (5) the number of rules submitted to the Comptroller General (GAO), and (6) the number of rules for which a resolution of disapproval was introduced in Congress.
Prohibits a rule from taking effect until the information required by this Act is posted on the Internet for not less than six months, unless the agency proposing the rule seeks an exemption under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or the President determines by executive order that such rule is necessary because of an imminent threat to health or safety or other emergency, for the enforcement of criminal laws, for national security, or to implement an international trade agreement. Makes such requirement effective eight months after enactment of this Act.
Title II: Regulatory Accountability Act - Regulatory Accountability Act of 2014 - (Sec. 202) Defines "major rule" and "major guidance," for purposes of this Act, as a rule or guidance that is likely to impose: (1) an annual cost on the economy of $100 million or more, adjusted annually for inflation; (2) a major increase in costs or prices; (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S. enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises; or (4) significant impacts on multiple sectors of the economy. Defines "high-impact rule" as a rule that is likely to have an annual cost on the economy of $1 billion or more, adjusted annually for inflation. Defines "negative-impact on jobs and wages rule" to mean a rule that is likely to reduce employment or wages.
(Sec. 203) Revises procedures for rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to require a federal agency, in the rulemaking process, to make all preliminary and final factual determinations based on evidence and to consider: (1) the legal authority under which a rule may be proposed, (2) the specific nature and significance of the problem the agency may address with a rule, (3) whether existing rules have created or contributed to the problem the agency may address with a rule and whether such rules may be amended or rescinded, (4) any reasonable alternatives for a new rule, and (5) the potential costs and benefits associated with potential alternative rules.
Revises rulemaking notice requirements to require an agency to: (1) publish in the Federal Register advance notice of proposed rulemaking involving a major rule, a high-impact rule, a negative-impact of jobs and wages rule, or a rule that involves a novel legal or policy issue arising out of statutory mandates; (2) consult with the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB before issuing a proposed rule and after the issuance of an advance notice of proposed rulemaking; (3) provide interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process; (4) hold a hearing before the adoption of any high-impact rule; (5) expand requirements for the adoption of a final rule, including requiring that the agency adopt a rule only on the basis of the best evidence and at the least cost; and (6) grant any interested person the right to petition for the issuance, amendment, or repeal of a rule. Specifies the minimum amount of information that must be included in an advance notice.
Requires the Administrator to issue guidelines to promote coordination, simplification, and harmonization of agency rules during the rulemaking process
Exempts from such revised procedures rulemaking that concerns monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee.
(Sec. 204) Imposes new requirements for issuing any major guidance or guidance that involves a novel legal or policy issue arising out of statutory mandates. Authorizes the Administrator to issue guidelines for agencies in issuing major guidance or other guidance.
(Sec. 205) Provides for electronic access to transcripts of testimony and exhibits and other papers filed in a rulemaking proceeding.
Requires the record of decision in a rulemaking proceeding to include information from a hearing under the Information Quality Act or on a high-impact rule.
Requires an agency to grant a petition for a hearing in the case of a major rule, unless the agency reasonably determines that a hearing would not advance consideration of the rule or would unreasonably delay completion of the rulemaking. Exempts from this requirement rulemakings that concern monetary policy proposed or implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal Open Market Committee.
(Sec. 206) Provides that an agency's denial of an Information Quality Act petition, or a failure to grant or deny such petition within 90 days, is reviewable by a court as a final action. Allows immediate judicial review of interim rules, other than in cases involving national security interests, issued without compliance with the notice requirements of this Act.
(Sec. 207) Revises standards for the scope of judicial review of agency rulemaking to prohibit a court from deferring to an agency's: (1) interpretation of a rule if the agency did not comply with APA requirements, (2) determination of the costs and benefits or other economic or risk assessment if the agency failed to conform to guidelines on such determinations and assessments established by the Administrator, (3) determinations made in the adoption of an interim rule, or (4) guidance.
(Sec. 208) Defines "substantial evidence" for purposes of evaluating agency adjudications and for rulemaking under APA as such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion in light of the record considered as a whole, taking into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from the weight of the evidence relied upon by the agency to support its decision.
(Sec. 209) Provides that the amendments made by this Act to specified provisions of federal law shall not apply to any rulemakings pending or completed on the enactment date of this Act.
Title III: Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act - Regulatory Flexibility Improvements Act of 2014 - (Sec. 302) Amends the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) to: (1) revise the definition of "rule" under such Act to exclude a rule pertaining to the protection of the rights of and benefits for veterans or a rule of particular (and not general) applicability relating to rates, wages, and other financial indicators; and (2) define "economic impact" with respect to a proposed or final rule as any direct economic effect on small entities from such rule and any indirect economic effect on small entities that is reasonably foreseeable and that results from such rule. Includes tribal organizations within the definition of "small governmental jurisdictions" for purposes of such Act.
Requires initial and final regulatory flexibility analyses to: (1) describe alternatives to a proposed rule that minimize any adverse significant economic impact or that maximize the beneficial significant economic impact on small entities, and (2) include revisions or amendments to a land management plan developed by the Secretary of Agriculture or the Secretary of the Interior under specified Acts.
Expands the applicability of RFA to interpretive rules involving internal revenue laws that impose a recordkeeping requirement, without regard to whether such requirement is imposed by statute or regulation.
Revises the definition of "small organization" for purposes of RFA.
(Sec. 303) Requires each federal agency to include in its regulatory flexibility agenda a brief description of the sector of the North American Industrial Classification System that is affected by a proposed agency rule that is likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
(Sec. 304) Requires a detailed statement in an initial regulatory flexibility analysis to include: (1) an estimate of the additional cumulative economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities, and (2) a description of any disproportionate economic impact on small entities or a specific class of such entities.
Requires an agency, in developing an initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis, to provide: (1) a quantifiable or numerical description of the effects of a proposed or final rule and alternatives to such rule, or (2) a more general descriptive statement and a detailed statement explaining why quantification is not practicable or reliable.
(Sec. 305) Repeals provisions allowing a waiver or delay of the completion of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. Requires the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA) to issue rules governing federal agency compliance with RFA requirements. Authorizes the Chief Counsel to modify or amend such rules, to intervene in agency adjudication relating to such rules, and to inform an agency of the impact of its rulemaking on small entities.
(Sec. 306) Revises requirements for agency notification of the SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy prior to the publication of any proposed rule. Requires agencies to provide the Chief Counsel with: (1) all materials prepared or utilized in making the proposed rule, and (2) information on the potential adverse and beneficial economic impacts of the proposed rule on small entities.
(Sec. 307) Modifies requirements for the periodic review of agency rules affecting small entities to require publication of a plan for review and placement of such plan on the agency website not later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act.
(Sec. 308) Provides for judicial review of an agency final rule for compliance with RFA requirements after publication of such rule.
(Sec. 309) Amends the federal judicial code to grant exclusive jurisdiction to the U.S. Courts of Appeals to review all final rules promulgated by the SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy governing agency compliance with RFA.
(Sec. 310) Amends the Small Business Act to authorize the SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy to specify detailed definitions or standards by which a business may be determined to be a small business (size standard) for purposes of all enactments other than the Small Business Act or the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (for which only the Administrator is authorized to specify small business size standards). Allows a party seeking judicial review of a rule which that includes a definition or size standard approved by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy to join the Chief Counsel as a party in an action for such review.
(Sec. 312) Amends the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 to require federal agencies, in developing small entity compliance guides, to solicit input from affected small entities or associations of small entities.
(Sec. 313) Requires the Comptroller General, not later than 90 days after the enactment of this Act, to complete and publish a study that examines whether the SBA Chief Counsel for Advocacy has the capacity and resources to carry out the duties of Chief Counsel under this Act.
Title IV: Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act - Sunshine for Regulatory Decrees and Settlements Act of 2014 - (Sec. 402) Defines a "covered civil action" as a civil action seeking to compel agency action and alleging that an agency is unlawfully withholding or unreasonably delaying an agency action relating to a regulatory action that would affect the rights of: (1) private persons other than the person bringing the action; or (2) a state, local, or tribal government. Defines a "covered consent decree" and a "covered settlement agreement" as: (1) a consent decree or settlement agreement entered into in a covered civil action, and (2) any other consent decree or settlement agreement that requires agency action relating to a regulatory action affecting the rights of private persons other than the person bringing the action or a state, local, or tribal government.
(Sec. 403) Requires an agency against which a covered civil action is brought to publish the notice of intent to sue and the complaint in a readily accessible manner and to provide interested parties an opportunity to intervene and to conduct settlement negotiations through mediation.
Requires an agency seeking to enter a covered consent decree or settlement agreement to publish such decree or agreement in the Federal Register and online not later than 60 days before it is filed with the court. Provides for public comment and public hearings on a proposed decree or agreement.
Requires the Attorney General or an agency head, if an agency is litigating a matter independently, to certify to the court that the Attorney General or the agency head approves of any proposed covered consent decree or settlement agreement.
Requires each federal agency to submit to Congress an annual report that includes: (1) the number, identity, and content of covered civil actions brought against, and covered consent decrees or settlement agreements entered against or into by, the agency; (2) a description of the statutory basis for each such covered consent decree or settlement agreement; and (3) an award of attorney fees or costs in a civil action resolved by a covered consent decree or settlement agreement.
(Sec. 404) Requires a court to grant de novo review to any motion filed by an agency to modify a previously-entered consent decree if the basis of such motion is that the terms of the decree are no longer fully in the public interest due to the agency's obligations to fulfill other duties or due to changed facts and circumstances.
(Sec. 405) Makes the provisions of this title applicable to any covered civil action filed, or any covered consent decree or settlement agreement proposed to a court, on or after the enactment of this title.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2804 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2804
To amend title 5, United States Code, to require the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to publish information
about rules on the Internet, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 24, 2013
Mr. Holding (for himself, Mr. Bachus, Mr. Coble, Mr. Franks of Arizona,
Mr. Chabot, Mr. Marino, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Smith of Missouri,
and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to
the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently
determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such
provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend title 5, United States Code, to require the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to publish information
about rules on the Internet, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``All Economic Regulations are
Transparent Act of 2013'' or the ``ALERT Act of 2013''.
SEC. 2. OIRA PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO RULES.
Title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after chapter
6, the following new chapter:
``CHAPTER 6A.--OIRA PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO RULES
``Sec. 650. Agency monthly submission to OIRA
``Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of the All
Economic Regulations are Transparent Act of 2013, and monthly
thereafter, the head of each agency shall submit to the Administrator
of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (referred to in
this chapter as the `Administrator'), in such a manner as the
Administrator may reasonably require, for each rule that the agency
expects to propose or finalize during the upcoming year--
``(1) a summary of the nature of the rule, including the
regulation identifier number and the docket number for the
rule;
``(2) the objectives of and legal basis for the issuance of
the rule, including--
``(A) any statutory or judicial deadline;
``(B) whether the legal basis restricts or
precludes the agency from conducting an analysis of the
costs or benefits of the rule during the rule making,
and if not, whether the agency plans to conduct an
analysis of the costs or benefits of the rule during
the rule making;
``(3) whether the agency plans to claim an exemption from
the requirements of section 553 pursuant to section 553(b)(B);
``(4) the stage of the rule making as of the date of
submission;
``(5) whether the rule is subject to review under section
610;
``(6) for any rule for which the agency has issued a
general notice of proposed rule making--
``(A) an approximate schedule for completing action
on the rule;
``(B) an estimate of whether the rule will cost--
``(i) less than $50,000,000;
``(ii) $50,000,000 or more but less than
$100,000,000;
``(iii) $100,000,000 or more but less than
$500,000,000;
``(iv) $500,000,000 or more but less than
$1,000,000,000;
``(v) $1,000,000,000 or more but less than
$5,000,000,000;
``(vi) $5,000,000,000 or more but less than
$10,000,000,000; or
``(vii) $10,000,000,000 or more.
``Sec. 651. OIRA publications
``(a) Agency-Specific Information Published Monthly.--Not later
than 60 days after the date of the enactment of the All Economic
Regulations are Transparent Act of 2013, and monthly thereafter, the
Administrator shall make publicly available on the Internet the
information that the Administrator receives from the head of each
agency under section 650.
``(b) Cumulative Assessment of Agency Rule Making Published
Annually.--
``(1) Publication in the federal register.--Beginning on
April 1 or October 1, whichever comes first, and annually
thereafter, the Administrator shall publish in the Federal
Register, for the preceding year--
``(A) the information that the Administrator
received from the head of each agency under section
650;
``(B) the number of rules and a list of each such
rule--
``(i) that was proposed by each agency,
including, for each such rule, an indication of
whether the issuing agency conducted an
analysis of the costs or benefits of the rule;
``(ii) that was finalized by each agency,
including, for each such rule, an indication of
whether--
``(I) the issuing agency conducted
an analysis of the costs or benefits of
the rule;
``(II) the agency claimed an
exemption from the procedures under
section 553 pursuant to section
553(b)(B); and
``(III) the rule was issued
pursuant to a statutory mandate or the
rule making is committed to agency
discretion by law;
``(C) the number of agency actions and a list of
each such action taken by each agency that--
``(i) repealed a rule;
``(ii) reduced the scope of a rule;
``(iii) reduced the cost of a rule; or
``(iv) accelerated the expiration date of a
rule; and
``(D) the total cost (without reducing the cost by
any offsetting benefits) of all rules proposed or
finalized, and the number of rules for which an
estimate of the cost of the rule was not available.
``(2) Publication on the internet.--Beginning on April 1 or
October 1, whichever comes first, and annually thereafter, the
Administrator shall make publicly available on the Internet--
``(A) the analysis of the costs or benefits, if
conducted, for each proposed rule or final rule issued
by an agency for the preceding year (as well as, for
the first publication, any analysis of the costs or
benefits conducted for a proposed or final rule, for
the 10 years preceding the date of the enactment of the
All Economic Regulations are Transparent Act of 2013);
``(B) the docket number and regulation identifier
number for each proposed or final rule issued by an
agency for the preceding year;
``(C) the number of rules and a list of each such
rule reviewed by the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget for the preceding year, and the
authority under which each such review was conducted;
``(D) the number of rules and a list of each such
rule for which the head of an agency completed a review
under section 610 for the preceding year;
``(E) the number of rules and a list of each such
rule submitted to the Comptroller General under section
801; and
``(F) the number of rules and a list of each such
rule for which a resolution of disapproval was
introduced in either the House of Representatives or
the Senate under section 802.
``(3) Effective date.--Paragraphs (1) and (2) shall take
effect on the date that is 60 days after the date of the
enactment of the All Economic Regulations are Transparent Act
of 2103.
``Sec. 652. Requirement for rules to appear in agency-specific monthly
publication
``(a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), a rule may not take
effect until the information required to be made publicly available on
the Internet regarding such rule pursuant to section 651(a) has been so
available for not less than 6 months.
``(b) Exceptions.--The requirement of subsection (a) shall not
apply in the case of a rule--
``(1) for which the agency issuing the rule claims an
exception under section 553(b)(B); or
``(2) which the President determines by Executive Order
should take effect because the rule is--
``(A) necessary because of an imminent threat to
health or safety or other emergency;
``(B) necessary for the enforcement of criminal
laws;
``(C) necessary for national security; or
``(D) issued pursuant to any statute implementing
an international trade agreement.
``Sec. 653. Definitions
``In this chapter, the terms `agency', `agency action', and `rule'
have the meanings given those terms in section 551.''.
<all>
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 8, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 9.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee amendment No. 9, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment No. 10.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment No. 10, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. George Miller (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 487, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment No. 11.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the George Miller (CA) amendment No. 11, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. George Miller (CA) demanded a recorded vote, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until a time to be announced.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 2804.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H2025)
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Ms. Esty moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H2025-2027; text: CR H2025)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Esty motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add at the end of the bill a new section titled no delay of any regulation that saves tax dollars, helps small businesses and veterans, prevents discrimination, or protects consumers.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2026)
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 187 - 229 (Roll no. 77). (consideration: CR H2027)
Roll Call #77 (House)Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 236 - 179 (Roll no. 78).
Roll Call #78 (House)On passage Passed by recorded vote: 236 - 179 (Roll no. 78).
Roll Call #78 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 2804.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.