Executive Needs to Faithfully Observe and Respect Congressional Enactments of the Law Act of 2014 or the ENFORCE the Law Act of 2014 - Authorizes either chamber of Congress, upon adoption of a resolution declaring that the President or any officer or employee of the United States has established or implemented a policy, practice, or procedure to refrain from enforcing, applying, following, or administering any federal statute, rule, regulation, program, policy, or other law in violation of the constitutional requirement that the President faithfully execute the laws of the United States, to bring a civil action for a declaratory judgment to that effect.
Grants jurisdiction to a three-judge panel of a U.S. district court to hear such civil action and provides for an expedited direct appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Requires the Comptroller General (GAO) to submit quarterly reports to the congressional judiciary committees on the costs of any civil action brought under this Act, incuding any attorney fees paid in connection with any such action.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4138 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 4138
To protect the separation of powers in the Constitution of the United
States by ensuring that the President takes care that the laws be
faithfully executed, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 4, 2014
Mr. Gowdy (for himself, Mr. Issa, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Smith
of Texas, Mr. Forbes, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Chaffetz,
Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mrs. Black, Mr.
Sensenbrenner, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Duncan of
South Carolina, Mr. Labrador, and Mr. Bachus) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To protect the separation of powers in the Constitution of the United
States by ensuring that the President takes care that the laws be
faithfully executed, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Executive Needs to Faithfully
Observe and Respect Congressional Enactments of the Law Act of 2014''
or the ``ENFORCE the Law Act of 2014''.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO BRING CIVIL ACTION FOR VIOLATION OF THE TAKE
CARE CLAUSE.
(a) In General.--Upon the adoption of a resolution of a House of
Congress declaring that the President, the head of any department or
agency of the United States, or any other officer or employee of the
United States has established or implemented a formal or informal
policy, practice, or procedure to refrain from enforcing, applying,
following, or administering any provision of a Federal statute, rule,
regulation, program, policy, or other law in violation of the
requirement that the President take care that the laws be faithfully
executed under article II, section 3, clause 5, of the Constitution of
the United States, that House is authorized to bring a civil action in
accordance with subsection (c), and to seek relief pursuant to sections
2201 and 2202 of title 28, United States Code. A civil action brought
pursuant to this subsection may be brought by a single House or both
Houses of Congress jointly, if both Houses have adopted such a
resolution.
(b) Resolution Described.--For the purposes of subsection (a), the
term ``resolution'' means only a resolution--
(1) the title of which is as follows: ``Relating to the
application of article II, section 3, clause 5, of the
Constitution of the United States.'';
(2) which does not have a preamble; and
(3) the matter after the resolving clause which is as
follows: ``That _______ has failed to meet the requirement of
article II, section 3, clause 5, of the Constitution of the
United States to take care that a law be faithfully executed,
with respect to _________.'' (the blank spaces being
appropriately filled in with the President or the person on
behalf of the President, and the administrative action in
question described in subsection (a), respectively).
(c) Special Rules.--If the House of Representatives or the Senate
brings a civil action pursuant to subsection (a), the following rules
shall apply:
(1) The action shall be filed in a United States district
court of competent jurisdiction and shall be heard by a 3-judge
court convened pursuant to section 2284 of title 28, United
States Code.
(2) A final decision in the action shall be reviewable only
by appeal directly to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Such appeal shall be taken by the filing of a notice of appeal
within 10 days, and the filing of a jurisdictional statement
within 30 days, of the entry of the final decision.
(3) It shall be the duty of the United States district
courts and the Supreme Court of the United States to advance on
the docket and to expedite to the greatest possible extent the
disposition of any such action and appeal.
<all>
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 511, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Conyers Part A amendment No. 1.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Conyers Part A amendment No. 1, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Conyers demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 511, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Nadler Part A amendment No. 2.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Nadler Part A amendment No. 2, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Mr. Nadler demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
The Committee rose informally to receive a message from the President of the United States, and resumed its sitting afterwards.
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 511, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Jackson Lee Part A amendment No. 3.
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Jackson Lee Part A amendment No. 3, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote announced that the noes had prevailed. Ms. Jackson Lee demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line
DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 511, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cicilline Part A amendment No. 4.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question on adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4138.
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H2337)
The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2329-2330)
Mr. Ruiz moved to recommit with instructions to Judiciary. (consideration: CR H2338-2339; text: CR H2338)
DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Ruiz motion to recommit with instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment to add at the end of the bill Section 3, Protecting States' Rights, and adding Section 4, Restoring Unemploymnet Benefits for America's Job Seekers. Pending a reservation of a point of order. Subsequently, the reservation was removed.
The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection. (consideration: CR H2338)
On motion to recommit with instructions Failed by recorded vote: 187 - 228 (Roll no. 123). (consideration: CR H2339)
Roll Call #123 (House)Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 233 - 181 (Roll no. 124).
Roll Call #124 (House)On passage Passed by recorded vote: 233 - 181 (Roll no. 124).
Roll Call #124 (House)Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.