Safer American Streets Act - Directs the Secretary of Transportation (DOT), for FY2015 and subsequent fiscal years, to withhold 10% of a state's apportionment of specified federal-aid highway program funds for any state or municipal government that employs an automated traffic enforcement system on a federal-aid highway.
Prohibits:
Repeals title IX of the Fiscal Year 1997 Budget Support Temporary Amendment Act of 1996 (relating to automated traffic enforcement in the District of Columbia).
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5755 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5755
To withhold certain highway funds from a State that uses an automated
traffic enforcement system on a Federal-aid highway.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
November 20, 2014
Mr. Stockman (for himself and Mr. Bentivolio) introduced the following
bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To withhold certain highway funds from a State that uses an automated
traffic enforcement system on a Federal-aid highway.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Safer American Streets Act''.
SEC. 2. WITHHOLDING OF FUNDS FOR USEAGE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC
ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS.
(a) Withholding of Funds for Usage of Automated Traffic Enforcement
Systems.--Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by
adding after section 156 the following:
``Sec. 157. Withholding of funds for usage of automated traffic
enforcement systems
``(a) Withholding of Funds for Noncompliance.--
``(1) For fiscal year 2015 and thereafter.--Beginning on
October 1, 2015, and every fiscal year thereafter, the
Secretary shall withhold 10 percent of the amount required to
be apportioned to any State under each of sections 104(b)(1),
104(b)(3), and 104(b)(4) of this title in which the State or
any municipal government therein employs an automated traffic
enforcement system on a Federal-aid highway.
``(2) Requirement.--A State meets the requirement of this
paragraph if the State certifies not later than 90 days before
the beginning of each fiscal year that neither the State nor
any municipal government therein employs an automated traffic
enforcement system on a Federal-aid highway.
``(b) Effect of Withholding of Funds.--No funds withheld under this
section from apportionment to any State shall be available for
apportionment to that State.
``(c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
``(1) Automated traffic enforcement system.--The term
`automated traffic enforcement system' means equipment that
takes a film or digital camera-based photograph which is linked
with a system that can detect a moving infraction and
synchronize the taking of a photograph with the occurrence of
such an infraction.
``(2) Moving infraction.--The term `moving infraction'
means any violation of State or local traffic law or ordinance
committed by the driver of a vehicle while it is in motion.''.
(b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for such chapter is amended
by adding at the end the following:
``157. Withholding of funds for usage of automated traffic enforcement
systems.''.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF AUTOMATED TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT SYSTEMS
IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
(a) Detection of a Moving Infraction.--The Mayor of the District of
Columbia may not use an automated traffic enforcement system to detect
a moving infraction in the District of Columbia.
(b) Evidence of a Moving Infraction.--Information obtained through
the use of an automated traffic enforcement system may not be used as
proof in an administrative adjudication under title II of the Traffic
Adjudication Act of 1978 (sec. 50-2302.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code).
SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.
Title IX of the Fiscal Year 1997 Budget Support Temporary Amendment
Act of 1996 (sec. 50-2209.01 et seq., D.C. Official Code) is repealed.
SEC. 5. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) Automated traffic enforcement system.--The term
``automated traffic enforcement system'' means equipment that
takes a film or digital camera-based photograph which is linked
with a system that can detect a moving infraction and
synchronize the taking of a photograph with the occurrence of
such an infraction.
(2) Moving infraction.--The term ``moving infraction''
means any conduct subject to administrative adjudication under
title II of the Traffic Adjudication Act of 1978 and with
respect to which the Attorney General of the District of
Columbia does not commence a proceeding in the Superior Court
of the District of Columbia.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line