Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the funds made available for the cost of the President's trip to Africa instead be used to compensate those who have been placed on an administrative furlough as a result of sequestration.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 275 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 275
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the funds
made available for the cost of the President's trip to Africa instead
be used to compensate those who have been placed on an administrative
furlough as a result of sequestration.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 25, 2013
Mr. Forbes submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the funds
made available for the cost of the President's trip to Africa instead
be used to compensate those who have been placed on an administrative
furlough as a result of sequestration.
Whereas, as a result of administrative furloughs, civil servants across the
country have had their regular salaries reduced;
Whereas the President and the First Lady are scheduled to travel to Senegal,
South Africa, and Tanzania from June 26 through July 3, 2013;
Whereas, when White House personnel are on official travel, certain personal
expenses, including per diem (food and lodging), car rentals, and other
incidentals, are paid by the Government; these expenses are paid by the
State Department for foreign travel;
Whereas most of the costs involve operational costs of the aircraft, and include
fuel, maintenance, engineering support, and per diem expenses for the
crew;
Whereas, in 2012, the United States Air Force indicated that the cost per hour
for the President's Boeing 747 (which is designated ``VC-25'' by the Air
Force) is $179,750;
Whereas President Obama's trip to Africa is estimated to cost $60,000,000 to
$100,000,000;
Whereas, in September of 1999, the Government Accountability Office estimated
that the estimated incremental costs of President Clinton's trips to
Africa was at least $42,800,000;
Whereas the President signed the Budget Control Act (Public Law 112-25), which
called for sequestration, on August 2, 2011;
Whereas sequestration took effect on March 1, 2013, and will cut
$984,000,000,000 over the nine-year period of 2013 through 2021;
Whereas, in 2013, there will be $85,000,000,000 in discretionary spending cuts,
which will equal between 5 percent and 13 percent of each agency's
budget, depending on the Federal agency; and
Whereas, in order to compensate for these budgetary cuts, some Federal agencies
have instituted administrative furloughs designed to absorb reduced
funding: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that
the funds made available for the cost of the President's trip to Africa
instead be used to compensate those who have been placed on an
administrative furlough as a result of sequestration.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line