Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that:
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 633 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 633
Expressing the sense of the House with respect to accountability for
mismanagement at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 20, 2014
Mr. Barrow of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Cassidy) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the
Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House with respect to accountability for
mismanagement at the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Whereas revelations in 2013 unveiled a pattern of inefficiency and misconduct at
Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Clinics (VAMC) across the
country;
Whereas the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General conducted
interviews with VA employees and inspected VA facilities across the
country;
Whereas on June 9, 2014, the VA released an initial audit of VA medical centers
across the country, conducted by the VA Inspector General, detailing a
pattern of mismanagement;
Whereas the Inspector General's audit found that VAMC scheduling staff were
pressured by VA management ``to utilize inappropriate practices in order
to make waiting times appear more favorable'';
Whereas the VA will undergo a review to determine why ``some front-line, middle,
and senior managers felt compelled to manipulate the VA's scheduling
process'';
Whereas in at least two instances, survey participants believed someone, other
than a scheduler, was ``routinely accessing records and changing desired
dates in order to improve performance measures'';
Whereas respondents felt ``threatened or coerced'' to alter patient appointment
dates and reported having been ``sanctioned or punished over scheduling
practices for not complying with supervisors' orders to inappropriately
enter or alter recorded desired dates''; and
Whereas section 600.1 of title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, directs the
Attorney General to appoint a Special Counsel when he or she determines
that--
(1) ``criminal investigation of a person or matter is warranted'';
(2) ``investigation or prosecution of that person or matter by a United
States Attorney's Office or litigating Division of the Department of
Justice would present a conflict of interest for the Department or other
extraordinary circumstances''; and
(3) ``under the circumstances, it would be in the public interest to
appoint an outside Special Counsel to assume responsibility for the
matter'': Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House that--
(1) actions by VA officials represent a clear violation of
the public's trust for the Department to provide access to
quality health care for our Nation's veterans and warrant
criminal investigation;
(2) the ability of the Administration to objectively
investigate its own wrongdoing warrants a Special Counsel to
determine whether mismanagement and misconduct at the VA was
criminal; and
(3) the appointment of a Special Counsel would be in the
public interest.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H5562)
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line