Directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs: (1) within 180 days after the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) submits a report to Congress in 2014 that identifies VA medical facilities at which scheduling practices did not comply with VA policies and procedures, to identify each VA employee who, during any of FY2011-FY2014, contributed to the purposeful omission of the names of veterans from an electronic wait list for health care at such a facility, who was a VA supervisor who knew or should have known that the employee contributed to such omission, and who received a bonus in part because of such omission; and (2) after notice and an opportunity for a hearing, to order such employee to repay the bonus.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2545 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2545
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to revoke bonuses paid to
employees involved in electronic wait list manipulations, and for other
purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 26, 2014
Ms. Ayotte (for herself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans'
Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to revoke bonuses paid to
employees involved in electronic wait list manipulations, and for other
purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RETURN OF BONUSES AWARDED TO EMPLOYEES OF DEPARTMENT OF
VETERANS AFFAIRS FOR PERFORMANCE THEY MISREPRESENTED.
(a) Investigations.--Not later than 180 days after the date on
which the Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Affairs
submits to Congress a report described in subsection (b), the Secretary
of Veterans Affairs shall identify each employee of the Department of
Veterans Affairs who--
(1) during any of fiscal years 2011 through 2014--
(A) contributed to the purposeful omission of the
name of one or more veterans waiting for health care
from an electronic wait list for a medical facility of
the Department identified by the Inspector General in
such report; or
(B) was the supervisor of an employee of the
Department, or was a supervisor of that supervisor, at
any level, who contributed to a purposeful omission as
described in subparagraph (A) and knew, or reasonably
should have known, that the employee contributed to
such purposeful omission; and
(2) received a bonus in part because of such omission.
(b) Reports Described.--A report described in this subsection is a
report submitted to Congress by the Inspector General in calendar year
2014 that identifies medical facilities of the Department at which
scheduling practices in use, or formerly in use, did not comply with
scheduling policies and procedures of the Department.
(c) Identification.--The Secretary shall identify employees
contributing to an omission described in subsection (a)(1) without
regard to whether the employee knowingly contributed to such omission
or contributed to such omission for the purpose of receiving a bonus.
(d) Repayment.--
(1) In general.--For each employee identified under
subsection (a) who received a bonus as described in such
subsection, the Secretary shall, after notice and an
opportunity for a hearing, issue an order directing the
employee to repay the amount of such bonus.
(2) Hearings.--A hearing under this subsection shall be
conducted in accordance with regulations relating to hearings
promulgated by the Secretary under chapter 75 of title 5,
United States Code.
(3) Appeal.--
(A) In general.--An employee against whom an order
is issued under paragraph (1) may appeal to the Merit
Systems Protection Board under section 7701 of title 5,
United States Code.
(B) Scope of review.--A review of an appeal by the
Merit Systems Protection Board under subparagraph (A)
shall be based on the record established through the
appellant's hearing conducted under paragraph (2).
(C) Standard of review.--The Merit Systems
Protection Board shall set aside an order issued under
paragraph (1) if the issuing of the order was clearly
erroneous or the result of a denial of procedural due
process.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line