Calls for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to: (1) reevaluate its recommendation against prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer for men in all age groups, (2) seriously engage and consult with specialists as it reevaluates its recommendation, and (3) identify areas for additional research and evaluation of methods of treatment of, and screening procedures for, prostate cancer.
Expresses the sense of the Senate that: (1) prostate cancer screening decisions should be made by each individual patient and his physician, taking into account the patient's risk factors and desire for treatment; and (2) steps should be taken to raise awareness of, and increase public knowledge about, prostate cancer, the benefits of early detection, and the appropriateness of screening tests.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 251
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Preventive
Services Task Force should reevaluate its recommendations against
prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer for men
in all age groups in consultation with appropriate specialists.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
September 23, 2013
Mr. Sessions submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States Preventive
Services Task Force should reevaluate its recommendations against
prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer for men
in all age groups in consultation with appropriate specialists.
Whereas the United States Preventive Services Task Force (referred to in this
preamble as the ``USPSTF'') is an independent panel of primary care
physicians, not employed by the Federal Government, who are experts in
preventive and evidence-based medicine;
Whereas the physicians on the USPSTF conduct scientific evidence reviews of a
broad range of clinical health care preventive services and develop
recommendations for primary care clinicians and health systems;
Whereas prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths of
men in the United States;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute estimates that, in 2013, 238,590 men will
be diagnosed with, and 29,720 men will die of, prostate cancer;
Whereas the National Cancer Institute estimates that 1 in 6 men will be
diagnosed with prostate cancer during his lifetime;
Whereas family history has been shown to be a risk factor for prostate cancer
for men of all races and ethnicities, and men with a family history of
prostate cancer are twice as likely to be diagnosed with the disease;
Whereas the USPSTF acknowledges that prostate cancer is the most commonly
diagnosed non-skin cancer for men in the United States, with a lifetime
risk for diagnosis estimated at 15.9 percent;
Whereas the USPSTF acknowledges that African-American men are twice as likely to
die from prostate cancer than other men in the United States;
Whereas the USPSTF does not have any members who are urologists, a type of
physician who specializes in diagnosing and treating patients with
prostate cancer;
Whereas the USPSTF does not have any members who are oncologists, a type of
physician who specializes in diagnosing and treating patients with
cancer;
Whereas the Food and Drug Administration first approved the prostate-specific
antigen (commonly referred to as ``PSA'') blood test for prostate cancer
screening and diagnosis in 1992 and, since that time, the mortality rate
due to prostate cancer has decreased by 40 percent;
Whereas, in August 2008, the USPSTF recommended against prostate-specific
antigen-based screening for prostate cancer for men ages 75 and older,
because the USPSTF determined that there was insufficient evidence to
assess the balance of benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening in
men younger than age 75;
Whereas, in May 2012, the USPSTF issued a new recommendation, to replace its
2008 recommendation, against prostate-specific antigen-based screening
for prostate cancer for men in all age groups, because the USPSTF
concluded that there is moderate-to-high certainty that the test has no
net benefit, or that the harms outweigh the benefits, and suggested that
this screening practice be discouraged;
Whereas the May 2012 recommendation against screening applies to all men in the
United States, regardless of age;
Whereas the May 2012 recommendation against screening applies to all men in the
United States, regardless of race, even though the USPSTF acknowledges
that African-American men have a substantially higher incidence rate for
prostate cancer than White men have and more than twice the mortality
rate from prostate cancer that White men have;
Whereas the May 2012 recommendation against screening applies to all men in the
United States, even though the USPSTF acknowledges that there is
convincing evidence that prostate-specific antigen-based testing helps
detect many cases of asymptomatic prostate cancer; and
Whereas the USPSTF acknowledges that clinical decisions regarding cancer
screening involve multiple considerations and that clinicians should
individualize decisionmaking to the specific patient or situation: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) the United States Preventive Services Task Force
should--
(A) reevaluate its recommendation against prostate-
specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer
for men in all age groups;
(B) seriously engage and consult with specialists,
including urologists and oncologists, as it reevaluates
its recommendation; and
(C) identify areas for additional research and
evaluation of methods of treatment of, and screening
procedures for, prostate cancer;
(2) prostate cancer screening decisions should be made by
each individual patient and his physician, taking into account
the personal risk factors of the patient, such as his overall
health, age, race, family history, and life expectancy, as well
as his desire for eventual treatment if he is diagnosed with
prostate cancer; and
(3) steps should be taken to raise awareness of, and
increase public knowledge about, prostate cancer, the benefits
of early detection, and the appropriateness of screening tests.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text of measure as introduced: CR S6684-6685)
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line