This bill amends the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to repeal the declaration that the deference that a court affords to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) regarding its determination of the meaning or interpretation of any provision of a federal consumer financial law shall be applied as if the CFPB were the only agency authorized to apply, enforce, interpret, or administer the provisions of that law.
In any judicial review of a CFPB agency action, the reviewing court shall determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of a CFPB agency action and decide de novo all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory provisions, as well as CFPB rules. No law may exempt any civil action for judicial review from the application of this bill except by specific reference to it.
[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5490 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5490
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require that
no deference be given to the interpretation of consumer financial law
by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, to define the scope of
judicial review of Bureau actions, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 15, 2016
Mrs. Love introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on
the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to require that
no deference be given to the interpretation of consumer financial law
by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, to define the scope of
judicial review of Bureau actions, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NO DEFERENCE TO THE INTERPRETATION OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL LAW
BY THE BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION.
(a) No Deference to Bureau Interpretation Over the Interpretation
of Another Agency.--The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12
U.S.C. 5481 et seq.) is amended--
(1) in section 1022(b)(4)--
(A) by striking ``(A) In general.--''; and
(B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
(2) in section 1061(b)(5)(E)--
(A) by striking ``affords the--'' and all that
follows through ``(i) Federal Trade Commission'' and
inserting ``affords the Federal Trade Commission'';
(B) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a period;
and
(C) by striking clause (ii).
SEC. 2. SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF BUREAU ACTIONS.
Section 1022 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12
U.S.C. 5512) is amended by adding at the end the following:
``(e) Scope of Judicial Review of Agency Actions.--Notwithstanding
any other provision of law, in any judicial review of an agency action
of the Bureau pursuant to chapter 7 of title 5, United States Code, to
the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing
court shall determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an
agency action of the Bureau and decide de novo all relevant questions
of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory
provisions, and rules made by the Bureau. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, this subsection shall apply in any action for
judicial review of an agency action of the Bureau authorized under any
provision of law. No law may exempt any such civil action from the
application of this subsection except by specific reference to this
subsection.''.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line