Expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the entering into of an agreement or compact by two or more states for cooperative effort and mutual assistance would be beneficial to the development of an Interstate 73 corridor.
Such an agreement may incorporate the following elements to the extent that they are consistent with federal law:
[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 585 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 585
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding an
Interstate 73 corridor transportation compact.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 13, 2016
Mr. Hurt of Virginia (for himself, Ms. Adams, Mr. Goodlatte, Mr.
Griffith, Mrs. Comstock, and Mr. Rice of South Carolina) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on
the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding an
Interstate 73 corridor transportation compact.
Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that
the entering into of an agreement or compact by 2 or more States, for
cooperative effort and mutual assistance, would be beneficial to the
development of an Interstate 73 corridor. Such an agreement may
incorporate the following elements to the extent that such elements are
consistent with Federal law and specifically section 1105(c)(5) of the
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991:
(1) Study, development, and promotion of a plan for the
design, construction, financing, and operation of the
Interstate 73 corridor through the States of South Carolina,
North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, and Michigan.
(2) Coordination of efforts to establish a common legal
framework in all the signatory States to authorize and
facilitate design, construction, financing, and operation of
the Interstate 73 corridor or through public-private
partnerships.
(3) Advocacy for Federal funding to support the
establishment of the Interstate 73 corridor.
(4) Making available to the Interstate 73 corridor project
funding and resources that are or may be appropriated by the
signatory States and allocated for that purpose.
(5) Doing all things necessary or convenient to facilitate
and coordinate the design, construction, financing, and
operation of the Interstate 73 corridor to the extent that such
plans and programs are consistent with Federal law and the laws
of the signatory States.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line