Judicial Review Improvement Act of 2017
This bill specifies the general standard for judicial review of actions by certain federal financial regulatory agencies.
Specifically, courts reviewing an action by such agency must generally decide de novo (i.e., without deference to the agency's interpretation) all relevant questions of law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory provisions and rules made by the agency.
[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3950 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3950
To specify the scope of judicial review of certain agency actions, and
for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
October 4, 2017
Mrs. Love (for herself, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Walker, Mr.
Gowdy, Mr. Labrador, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Hill, and Mr. Luetkemeyer)
introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on
the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To specify the scope of judicial review of certain agency actions, and
for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Judicial Review Improvement Act of
2017''.
SEC. 2. SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTIONS.
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in any
judicial review of an agency action pursuant to chapter 7 of title 5,
United States Code, to the extent necessary to decide when presented,
the reviewing court shall determine the meaning or applicability of the
terms of an agency action and decide de novo all relevant questions of
law, including the interpretation of constitutional and statutory
provisions and rules made by an agency. If the reviewing court
determines that a statutory or regulatory provision relevant to its
decision contains a gap or ambiguity, the court shall not interpret
that gap or ambiguity as an implicit delegation to the agency of
legislative rulemaking authority and shall not rely on such gap or
ambiguity as a justification either for interpreting agency authority
expansively or for deferring to the agency's interpretation on the
question of law. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, this Act
shall apply in any action for judicial review of agency action
authorized under any provision of law. No law may exempt any such civil
action from the application of this Act except by specific reference to
this Act.
(b) Agency Defined.--For purposes of this section, the term
``agency'' means the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the
Federal Housing Finance Agency, the Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Securities
and Exchange Commission.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line