This resolution expresses disapproval of certain COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019) vaccine distribution guidance issued by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and encourages the committee to revise the guidance to prioritize vaccination of those aged 65 and older.
[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1272 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 1272
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress
disapproves of the December 20 COVID-19 vaccine distribution
availability timeline guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
December 24, 2020
Mr. Green of Tennessee (for himself and Ms. Gabbard) submitted the
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and
Commerce
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress
disapproves of the December 20 COVID-19 vaccine distribution
availability timeline guidance of the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
Whereas, on December 20, 2020, the CDC ACIP released updated guidance to States
regarding distribution of COVID-19 vaccines across the country;
Whereas the CDC has consistently warned of serious health complications and high
mortality rates amongst elder Americans over the age of 65 if they are
infected with COVID-19;
Whereas statistics gathered throughout the COVID-19 pandemic cite a disturbing
ratio of 79 percent of total related deaths being amongst elder
Americans over the age of 65;
Whereas CDC guidance outlines the first priority for COVID-19 vaccine
distribution will go to high-risk health care professionals and
residents of long-term care facilities;
Whereas CDC guidance recommends the second priority for COVID-19 vaccine
delivery will be the simultaneous distribution to 30 million ``Frontline
Essential Workers'' and 21 million Americans 75 years of age and older;
Whereas the majority of ``Frontline Essential Workers'' are under the age of 65,
and the CDC is therefore prioritizing young, healthy people ahead of
elder Americans between 65 to 74 years old, including those with
underlying health conditions;
Whereas CDC guidance recommends the third priority for COVID-19 vaccine delivery
will be the simultaneous distribution to 57 million ``Essential
Workers'', 32 million elder Americans 65-74 years of age, and 110
million Americans 16-64 years of age with high-risk medical conditions;
Whereas the majority of ``Essential Workers'' are under the age of 65, and the
CDC is therefore placing these workers at the same level of priority as
vulnerable elder Americans 65-74 years old, including many with high-
risk health complications;
Whereas the current guidance allows 87 million ``Essential Workers'' to receive
the vaccine at or before the same time as elder Americans 65 and older,
and the CDC is therefore prioritizing tens of millions of young, healthy
workers to receive the vaccine ahead of those who are statistically far
more likely to die upon contracting the disease, according to their own
statistics;
Whereas the CDC itself, as of August 18, 2020, reported ratios of
hospitalization for age groups compared to the base of 18-29-year-olds
as the following:
(1) 0-4 years, 4 x lower,
(2) 5-17 years, 9 x lower,
(3) 18-29 years, Comparison Group,
(4) 30-39 years, 2 x higher,
(5) 40-49 years, 3 x higher,
(6) 50-64 years, 4 x higher,
(7) 65-74 years, 5 x higher,
(8) 75-84 years, 8 x higher,
(9) 85+ years, 13 x higher;
Whereas the CDC itself, as of August 18, 2020, reports ratios of mortality for
age groups compared to the base of 18-29-year-olds as the following:
(1) 0-4 years, 9 x lower,
(2) 5-17 years, 16 x lower,
(3) 18-29 years, Comparison Group,
(4) 30-39 years, 4 x higher,
(5) 40-49 years, 10 x higher,
(6) 50-64 years, 30 x higher,
(7) 65-74 years, 90 x higher,
(8) 75-84 years, 220 x higher,
(9) 85+ years, 630 x higher;
Whereas it has been scientifically established that the COVID vaccines are
highly effective in preventing vaccine recipients from developing severe
or life-threatening symptoms; and
Whereas it has not yet been scientifically established that the vaccine is
effective in preventing vaccine recipients from spreading the disease to
others: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
(1) disapproves of the December 20 COVID-19 vaccine
distribution availability timeline guidance of CDC ACIP
prioritizing young, healthy workers above many aged 65 and
older; and
(2) encourages CDC ACIP to revise its COVID-19 vaccine
guidance to prioritize those aged 65 and older before providing
the vaccine to those younger than 65.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line