This resolution recognizes the right to counsel in civil proceedings involving basic human needs and expresses support for efforts to provide counsel to low-income individuals in these proceedings.
[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 960 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. RES. 960
Recognizing the right to counsel in civil proceedings.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 8, 2020
Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mr. Cohen, Mrs.
Dingell, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Omar, Mr. Raskin, Ms.
Schakowsky, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Upton, Ms. Tlaib,
Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, and Mr. Nadler) submitted the following
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Recognizing the right to counsel in civil proceedings.
Whereas the justice system in the United States depends on fair and equal access
to the courts as a fundamental right in a democratic society;
Whereas the first line of the United States Constitution identifies ``establish
Justice'' as a purpose of the Constitution;
Whereas, in criminal proceedings involving imprisonment, the United States
Constitution guarantees a lawyer for anyone unable to afford one in
order to ensure fairness and equal treatment;
Whereas engraved in stone above the entrance to the United States Supreme Court
reads ``Equal Justice Under Law'';
Whereas Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Texas and president of the
Conference of Chief Justices Nathan Hecht has said ``justice for only
those who can afford it is neither justice for all nor justice at all'';
Whereas civil proceedings often determine issues involving basic human needs,
including shelter, custody of children, safety from abuse, health, and
sustenance;
Whereas the American Bar Association, which is the largest voluntary association
of legal professionals in the world, has long urged the Federal
Government and State and territorial governments to provide legal
counsel as a matter of right at public expense to low-income individuals
in adversarial proceedings involving basic human needs, including
shelter, sustenance, safety, health, and child custody, as determined by
each jurisdiction;
Whereas individuals without lawyers face difficult and often insurmountable
barriers to obtaining justice in the courts;
Whereas courts attempting to provide justice to individuals without lawyers
often cannot obtain vital information necessary for making fully
informed decisions on the merits;
Whereas the 2017 Justice Gap Report published by the federally funded Legal
Services Corporation found that at least 71 percent of low-income
households experience a civil legal problem, including problems
regarding domestic violence, veterans' benefits, disability access,
evictions, housing conditions, and health care;
Whereas the 2017 Justice Gap Report found that low-income individuals in the
United States received inadequate or no legal help for 86 percent of
their civil legal problems;
Whereas millions of individuals in the United States cannot afford to hire a
lawyer, including approximately 94,000,000 individuals with family
incomes below 200 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines (as defined
by the Department of Health and Human Services);
Whereas assistance programs support less than 1 civil legal aid attorney per
10,000 individuals with an income under 200 percent of the Federal
poverty guidelines;
Whereas countless studies have shown that programs that provide attorneys to
low-income individuals produce fairer outcomes, promote public
confidence in the justice system, facilitate greater judicial
efficiency, and save taxpayer dollars;
Whereas a 2015 report titled ``The Landscape of Civil Litigation in State
Courts'' published by the National Center for State Courts found that
only 26 percent of defendants have an attorney;
Whereas the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court
Administrators resolved in 2015 to ``support the aspirational goal of
100 percent access to effective assistance for essential civil legal
needs'';
Whereas self-represented litigants face significantly worse outcomes in court,
including that--
(1) in Montgomery County, Maryland, domestic violence victims without
lawyers are almost three times more likely than those with lawyers to drop
their cases before obtaining final protection;
(2) in Maricopa County, Arizona, judges take, on average, less than a
minute to hear eviction proceedings involving unrepresented tenants, with
judgments overwhelmingly favoring landlords;
(3) in Wisconsin, Social Security Disability claimants with
representation succeed up to 70 percent of the time while unrepresented
claimants succeed only 30 to 55 percent of the time; and
(4) nationwide, only 14 percent of defendants in debt collection
proceedings have attorneys (compared with 99 percent of plaintiffs) and
defendants with an attorney are significantly more likely to prevail
(including 10 times more likely to prevail in Virginia);
Whereas investing in civil legal aid provides enormous cost savings to States,
including that--
(1) in 2016, Florida saved $60,400,000 by providing civil legal
services, including $2,900,000 in avoided costs of emergency shelter,
$50,600,000 in avoided foreclosure costs, and $6,900,000 in avoided costs
associated with domestic violence;
(2) for every $1 spent on civil legal aid for housing cases in
Massachusetts in 2014 the Commonwealth saved $2.69 on other services,
including emergency shelter, health care, foster care, and law enforcement,
and by providing legal services to survivors of domestic violence,
Massachusetts saved $2 for each $1 spent that year;
(3) in 2011, a $53,600,000 investment in civil legal services in
Pennsylvania created 2,643 jobs and yielded $594,000,000 in income and cost
savings for residents, including a $25,000,000 savings in emergency shelter
costs and an influx of $118,000,000 in Social Security benefits for low-
income residents; and
(4) in 2008, civil legal aid in Missouri helped 130 low-income families
avoid homelessness, saving the State $1,500,000 in emergency shelter costs,
and that aid provided representation in domestic violence proceedings that
saved the State $2,200,000 in avoided costs, including costs relating to
medical care for injuries, police resources, and counseling for affected
children;
Whereas every State has enacted legislation to guarantee counsel for some types
of civil proceedings, most commonly child welfare and mental health
proceedings, but the reach of these laws is very limited;
Whereas a few States, counties, and cities throughout the United States have
sought to address unmet civil legal needs by guaranteeing attorneys for
individuals who cannot afford them in proceedings affecting basic human
needs, including that--
(1) since 1975, the State of New York has provided a right to appointed
counsel for individuals living below 250 percent of the Federal poverty
guidelines in critical family law proceedings, including proceedings
related to adoption, child custody, and domestic violence;
(2) since 2009, California has funded the provision of attorneys in
several counties for individuals living below 200 percent of the Federal
poverty guidelines in proceedings involving basic human needs, including
housing and family law proceedings;
(3) since 2008, Wyoming has provided a right to appointed counsel for
unrepresented individuals subject to civil commitment proceedings for
mental illness;
(4) in 2017, New York City enacted legislation to provide a right to
counsel by 2022 for all tenants subject to eviction who are living at or
below 200 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines and appropriated funds
to guarantee, in some areas of the city, the provision of full legal
assistance to income-eligible tenants and brief consultation services to
all other tenants;
(5) in 2017 and 2018, the District of Columbia and Newark, New Jersey,
respectively, began appropriating funding to provide legal counsel in
eviction proceedings for individuals who live below 200 percent of the
Federal poverty guidelines, with Newark, New Jersey providing legal counsel
as a matter of right;
(6) in 2018, the San Francisco Mayor's Office of Housing and Community
Development began providing $5,800,000 to 10 nonprofit law firms to
implement the voter-approved ballot measure to guarantee representation for
all tenants facing eviction in the city;
(7) in 2019, Los Angeles County, California, provided funding for pilot
projects to provide legal assistance in eviction proceedings for
individuals living below 80 percent of the median income in rent-burdened
ZIP Codes;
(8) in 2019, the Cleveland City Council established a right to legal
services provided through city-funded legal aid programs for all tenants in
eviction proceedings who have children and live at or below 100 percent of
the Federal poverty guidelines; and
(9) in 2019, the Philadelphia City Council established a right to legal
services provided through city-funded legal aid programs for all tenants in
eviction proceedings who live at or below 200 percent of the Federal
poverty guidelines;
Whereas access to free legal representation has successfully helped low-income
individuals in the United States preserve the necessities of life,
including that--
(1) in New York City, during the first year of a city-funded program to
provide counsel in eviction proceedings, 84 percent of the tenants who
received a lawyer remained in their homes (21,955 individuals in 7,847
households); and
(2) during the first 5 years of California's Sargent Shriver Civil
Counsel Act, adopted in 2009, 10 pilot projects served nearly 27,000
individuals in proceedings involving the loss of their homes, child custody
disputes, or the urgent need for a family guardianship or conservatorship,
with housing services alone affecting over 73,000 household members; and
Whereas the unprecedented health and economic crises caused by the COVID-19
pandemic are compounding and intensifying the legal needs of low-income
individuals, including that--
(1) millions more individuals and families will become eligible for
legal assistance through legal aid programs due to lost jobs, furloughed
employees, and medical debt;
(2) more than 30,000,000 individuals filed for unemployment benefits
during the period beginning on March 15, 2020, and ending on April 25,
2020;
(3) millions of individuals are unable to make rent or mortgage
payments and are at risk of, or are facing, eviction or foreclosure
proceedings;
(4) according to an analysis of over 13,000,000 housing units
nationwide conducted by the National Multifamily Housing Council, 31
percent of tenants failed to pay rent during the first 5 days of April
2020, compared with 18 percent of tenants who failed to pay rent during the
same period in 2019;
(5) according to a survey completed in St. Louis, Missouri, 45 percent
of renters do not have enough money in savings to pay rent for even a
single month;
(6) police departments across the United States are seeing dramatic
increases in reports of domestic violence while, as of April 10, 2020, over
90 percent of individuals are subject to stay-at-home orders; and
(7) a survey of the requests for legal assistance received by Legal
Services Corporation grantees during the last two weeks of March 2020,
compared with the requests received during the same time period in 2019,
showed that--
G (A) Legal Services of Vermont had a 50-percent increase in
requests for legal assistance;
G (B) Legal Aid of Arkansas had a 13.2-percent increase in overall
requests for legal assistance and a 50-percent increase in requests for
housing-related cases; and
G (C) Montana Legal Services had a 30-percent increase in demand for
legal aid, with most cases involving evictions, domestic violence, consumer
debt, and unemployment benefits: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives finds that--
(1) the lack of counsel for low-income individuals in civil
proceedings diminishes the justice system in the United States;
(2) to effectively and efficiently address the national
crisis described in paragraph (1), there must be a right to
counsel in the civil justice system for cases involving basic
human needs, including health, safety, family, shelter, or
sustenance; and
(3) the Federal Government shares the burden with, and
should support, State and local efforts to guarantee the right
to counsel in the civil justice system and reduce the justice
gap by providing counsel in appropriate civil proceedings
without cost for low-income individuals.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line