Independent Agency Regulatory Analysis Act
This bill authorizes the President to require an independent regulatory agency to (1) comply with regulatory analysis requirements applicable to other federal agencies, (2) provide the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs with an assessment of the costs and benefits of a proposed or final economically significant rule and an assessment of costs and benefits of potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives to the rule, (3) publish the assessments with the rules, and (4) submit to the office for review any proposed or final economically significant rule.
An economically significant rule is a rule that is likely to (1) have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; or (2) adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities.
In addition, it prohibits judicial review of an independent regulatory agency's compliance with the requirements of this bill.
[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 869 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 869
To affirm the authority of the President to require independent
regulatory agencies to comply with regulatory analysis requirements
applicable to executive agencies, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 26, 2019
Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Johnson, Ms. Collins, Ms. Ernst, and Mr.
Lankford) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To affirm the authority of the President to require independent
regulatory agencies to comply with regulatory analysis requirements
applicable to executive agencies, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Independent Agency Regulatory
Analysis Act''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act--
(1) the term ``Administrator'' means the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs;
(2) the term ``agency'' has the meaning given the term in
section 3502(1) of title 44, United States Code;
(3) the term ``economically significant rule'' means any
rule that the Administrator determines is likely to--
(A) have an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; or
(B) adversely affect in a material way the economy,
a sector of the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or communities;
(4) the term ``independent regulatory agency'' has the
meaning given the term in section 3502(5) of title 44, United
States Code; and
(5) the term ``rule''--
(A) means a rule, as that term is defined in
section 551 of title 5, United States Code; and
(B) does not include a rule of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System or the Federal
Open Market Committee relating to monetary policy.
SEC. 3. REGULATORY ANALYSIS BY INDEPENDENT AGENCIES.
(a) In General.--The President may by Executive order require an
independent regulatory agency to comply, to the extent permitted by
law, with regulatory analysis requirements applicable to other
agencies, including the requirements to--
(1) identify the problem that the agency intends to address
by a new rule (including, where applicable, the failures of
private markets or public institutions that warrant new agency
action) and assess the significance of that problem;
(2) examine whether any existing rule (or other law) has
created, or contributed to, the problem that a new rule is
intended to correct and whether the existing rule (or other
law) should be modified to achieve the intended goal of the new
rule more effectively;
(3) identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including providing economic incentives to
encourage the desired behavior, or providing information upon
which choices can be made by the public;
(4) consider to the extent reasonable in setting regulatory
priorities, the degree and nature of the risks posed by various
substances or activities within its jurisdiction;
(5) design its rules in the most cost-effective manner to
achieve the regulatory objective and, in doing so, consider
incentives for innovation, consistency, predictability, the
costs of enforcement and compliance (to the Federal Government,
regulated entities, and the public), flexibility, distributive
impacts, and equity;
(6) assess the costs and the benefits of the intended rule
and, recognizing some costs and benefits are difficult to
quantify, propose or adopt a rule only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the rule justify its costs;
(7) base its rulemaking decisions on the best reasonably
obtainable scientific, technical, economic, and other
information concerning the need for, and consequences of, the
intended rule;
(8) identify and assess alternative forms of regulation
and, to the extent feasible, specify performance objectives,
rather than specifying the behavior or manner of compliance
that regulated entities must adopt;
(9) seek the views of appropriate State, local, and Tribal
officials before imposing regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect State, local, or Tribal
governmental entities, whenever feasible;
(10) avoid rules that are inconsistent or incompatible
with, or duplicative of, other rules of the independent
regulatory agency or other agencies;
(11) tailor rules to impose the least burden on society,
including individuals, businesses of differing sizes, and other
entities (including small communities and governmental
entities), consistent with achieving the regulatory objectives,
and taking into account, among other factors, and to the extent
practicable, the cost of cumulative rules;
(12) draft each rule to be simple and easy to understand,
with the goal of minimizing the potential for uncertainty and
litigation arising from uncertainty; and
(13) periodically review its existing economically
significant rules to determine whether any such rules should be
modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed so as to make the
regulatory program of the agency more effective or less
burdensome in achieving the regulatory objectives.
(b) Economically Significant Rules.--For any proposed or final rule
identified by an independent regulatory agency as, or determined by the
Administrator to be, an economically significant rule, the President
may by Executive order require the independent regulatory agency to
provide to the Administrator and publish with the proposed and final
rule the following information, to the extent permitted by law:
(1) An assessment, including the underlying analysis, of
benefits anticipated from the rule together with, to the extent
feasible, a quantification of those benefits.
(2) An assessment, including the underlying analysis, of
costs anticipated from the rule together with, to the extent
feasible, a quantification of those costs.
(3) An assessment, including the underlying analysis, of
costs and benefits of potentially effective and reasonably
feasible alternatives to the rule, identified by the agencies
or the public, including improving existing regulations and
reasonably viable nonregulatory actions, and an explanation of
why the planned regulatory action is preferable to the
identified potential alternatives.
(c) Review by Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.--
(1) Requirement to seek review.--The President may, by
Executive order, require an independent regulatory agency to
submit to the Administrator for review--
(A) any proposed economically significant rule,
either prior to publication of the notice of proposed
rulemaking or, if the head of the independent
regulatory agency elects, during the general public
comment period; and
(B) any final economically significant rule, prior
to publication of the final rule.
(2) Nonbinding assessment.--An Executive order issued under
this Act may require that, not later than 90 days after the
independent regulatory agency submits a proposed or final
economically significant rule for review, the Administrator
submit for inclusion in the rulemaking record the assessment of
the Administrator of the extent to which the independent
regulatory agency has complied with any of the regulatory
analysis requirements made applicable by Executive order.
(3) Determination and explanation by independent agency.--
An Executive order issued under this Act may require that, if
the Administrator concludes under paragraph (2) that the
independent regulatory agency did not comply with 1 or more
requirements of the Executive order with respect to a proposed
or final economically significant rule, the head of the
independent regulatory agency that issued the economically
significant rule shall include with the final rule--
(A) a determination that the rule complies with the
specified requirement or requirements and an
explanation of that determination; and
(B) if applicable, an explanation why the
independent regulatory agency did not comply with one
or more of the specified requirements, based on the
statutory provision authorizing the rule.
SEC. 4. LIMITATION ON JUDICIAL REVIEW.
(a) In General.--The compliance or noncompliance of an independent
regulatory agency with the requirements of an Executive order issued
under this Act shall not be subject to judicial review.
(b) Agency Record.--When an action for judicial review of a rule
promulgated by an independent regulatory agency is instituted, any
determination, analysis, or explanation produced by the independent
regulatory agency, and any assessment produced by the Administrator,
pursuant to an Executive order issued under this Act, shall constitute
part of the whole record of agency action in connection with the
review.
(c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be
construed to bar judicial review of any other impact statement or
similar analysis required by any other provision of law if judicial
review of the statement or analysis is otherwise permitted by law.
SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to limit the authority of
the President with respect to independent regulatory agencies under any
other applicable law.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line