This resolution declares that the Pledge of Allegiance has been a valuable part of life for the people of the United States for generations and defends its constitutionality.
[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 715 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]
<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. RES. 715
Expressing support for the Pledge of Allegiance.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
September 24, 2020
Mr. Braun (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Scott of
Florida, Mr. Moran, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Young, Mr. Rubio,
Mr. Cramer, Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Blackburn, Mrs. Loeffler, Mr. Boozman,
Mr. Risch, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Grassley, Mr.
Hoeven, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Inhofe, Mrs. Fischer,
Mr. Cornyn, and Mr. Cotton) submitted the following resolution; which
was considered and agreed to
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Expressing support for the Pledge of Allegiance.
Whereas the United States was founded on principles of religious freedom by the
Founders, many of whom were deeply religious;
Whereas the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States embodies
principles intended to guarantee freedom of religion both through the
free exercise thereof and by prohibiting the Government from
establishing a religion;
Whereas the Pledge of Allegiance was written by Francis Bellamy, a Baptist
Minister, and first published in the September 8, 1892, issue of the
Youth's Companion;
Whereas, in 1954, Congress added the words ``under God'' to the Pledge of
Allegiance;
Whereas, for over 60 years, the Pledge of Allegiance has included references to
the United States flag, to the country having been established as a
union ``under God'', and to the country being dedicated to securing
``liberty and justice for all'';
Whereas, in 1954, Congress believed it was acting constitutionally when it
revised the Pledge of Allegiance;
Whereas the Senate of the 116th Congress believes that the Pledge of Allegiance
is a constitutional expression of patriotism;
Whereas patriotic songs, engravings on United States legal tender, and
engravings on Federal buildings also contain general references to
``God'';
Whereas the Supreme Court overturned Newdow v. United States Congress, 328 F.3d
466 (9th Cir. 2003), a case in which the United States Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit held that the recitation of the Pledge of
Allegiance by a student's public school teacher violated the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States; and
Whereas the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit later concluded
that its previous opinion in Newdow was no longer binding precedent,
that case law from the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States had subsequently changed, and that Congress, when passing
the new version of the Pledge of Allegiance, established a secular
purpose for the use of the terms ``under God'' and, thus, the United
States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the recitation of
the Pledge of Allegiance by public school teachers: Now, therefore, be
it
Resolved, That--
(1) the Pledge of Allegiance has been a valuable part of
life for the people of the United States for generations; and
(2) the Senate strongly defends the constitutionality of
the Pledge of Allegiance.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Passed/agreed to in Senate: Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.(consideration: CR S5847; text: CR S5875)
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5847; text: CR S5875)
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line