This bill requires the Government Accountability Office to study the efficacy and adverse impacts of wearing masks to reduce the spread of COVID-19 (i.e., coronavirus disease 2019).
This study must specifically address
[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1342 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
117th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 1342
To authorize a study on the efficacy and potential negative impacts of
masks to human health, and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
February 25, 2021
Mr. Gohmert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on
the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the
Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall
within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To authorize a study on the efficacy and potential negative impacts of
masks to human health, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress that--
(1) the Constitution does not permit a mask mandate through
use of exclusively Executive power;
(2) Congress has not enacted any such law for the President
to enforce;
(3) masks do not fall within any of the Executive
authorities, according to article II, section 2 of the United
States Constitution;
(4) even Congress has no authority under the United States
Constitution to impose widespread mask mandates on the States
and people;
(5) the Constitution reserves ``police power'', for the
protection of health, safety, and morals, to the States;
(6) even though a State has police power, strict scrutiny
is still applied when laws infringe on fundamental liberties,
and in such instance, government action is only constitutional
when it both achieves a compelling goal and is narrowly
tailored or the least restrictive alternative to achieve that
goal;
(7) in our constitutional republic, the Federal Government
cannot do as it pleases, but must exercise power only in
keeping with the strict limits as enumerated in the
Constitution;
(8) while the Constitution ensures that the Federal
Government cannot mandate that all Americans wear masks, any
government should not take such an action unless the potential
for causing countless Americans to have adverse health impacts
is fully considered and studied, and there is no other less
restrictive measures that could adequately be taken; and
(9) although Americans are fully equipped to adjust their
activities and lifestyles to account for the risk of SARS-CoV-
2, including wearing a mask at all times if one should choose
to, it is unjust to require all Americans to take an action if
that action could mean deteriorated health and even death of
some and no exceptions are permitted.
SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON EFFICACY AND POTENTIAL NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF MASKS
TO HUMAN HEALTH.
(a) In General.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall
conduct a study on the efficacy and potential negative impacts of masks
to human health.
(b) Topics.--The study under subsection (a) shall address each of
the following:
(1) Evidence that various mask options (including N-95
masks, basic medical masks, and cloth masks) actually prevent
the spread of SARS-CoV-2, and to what extent such masks are
successful compared to no mask or a less restrictive
methodology.
(2) Evidence regarding any safety concerns with the common
types of masks worn (including N-95 masks, basic medical masks,
and cloth masks).
(3) Any adverse side effects of mask wearing.
(4) Any potential for permanent adverse effects including
deaths resulting from mask wearing.
(5) Any evidence that mask wearing is particularly
dangerous if an individual has underlying conditions, to
include allergies, asthma, respiratory difficulty, or any other
bodily condition that can impact breathing or lung capacity and
functioning.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line