No official summary available for this bill.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3919 Introduced in House (IH)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 3919
To direct the Director of the National Security Agency to develop
strategies to secure artificial intelligence related technologies.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 11, 2025
Mr. LaHood (for himself, Mr. Moolenaar, Mr. Gottheimer, and Mr.
Krishnamoorthi) introduced the following bill; which was referred to
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To direct the Director of the National Security Agency to develop
strategies to secure artificial intelligence related technologies.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Advanced AI Security Readiness
Act''.
SEC. 2. AI SECURITY PLAYBOOK.
(a) Requirement.--The Director of the National Security Agency,
acting through the Artificial Intelligence Security Center (or
successor office), shall develop strategies (in this section referred
to as the ``AI Security Playbook'') to defend covered AI technologies
from technology theft by threat actors.
(b) Elements.--The AI Security Playbook under subsection (a) shall
include the following:
(1) Identification of potential vulnerabilities in advanced
AI data centers and among advanced AI developers capable of
producing covered AI technologies, with a focus on
cybersecurity risks and other security challenges that are
unique to protecting covered AI technologies and critical
components of such technologies (such as threat vectors that do
not typically arise, or are less severe, in the context of
conventional information technology systems).
(2) Identification of components or information that, if
accessed by threat actors, would meaningfully contribute to
progress made by the actor with respect to developing covered
AI technologies, including with respect to--
(A) AI models and key components of such models;
(B) core insights relating to the development of
advanced AI systems, including with respect to training
such systems, the inferences made by such systems, and
the engineering of such systems; and
(C) other related information.
(3) Strategies to detect, prevent, and respond to cyber
threats by threat actors targeting covered AI technologies.
(4) Identification of the levels of security, if any, that
would require substantial involvement by the United States
Government in the development or oversight of highly advanced
AI systems.
(5) Analysis of how the United States Government would be
involved to achieve the levels of security identified in
paragraph (4), including a description of a hypothetical
initiative to build covered AI technology systems in a highly
secure governmental environment, considering, at a minimum,
cybersecurity protocols, provisions to protect model weights,
efforts to mitigate insider threats (including personnel
vetting and security clearance adjudication processes), access
control procedures, counterintelligence and anti-espionage
measures, contingency and emergency response plans, and other
strategies that would be used to reduce threats of technology
theft by threat actors.
(c) Form.--The AI Security Playbook under subsection (a) shall
include--
(1) detailed methodologies and intelligence assessments,
which may be contained in a classified annex; and
(2) an unclassified portion with general guidelines and
best practices suitable for dissemination to relevant
individuals, including in the private sector.
(d) Engagement.--
(1) In general.--In developing the AI Security Playbook
under subsection (a), the Director shall--
(A) engage with prominent AI developers and
researchers, as determined by the Director, to assess
and anticipate the capabilities of highly advanced AI
systems relevant to national security, including by--
(i) conducting a comprehensive review of
industry documents pertaining to the security
of AI systems with respect to preparedness
frameworks, scaling policies, risk management
frameworks, and other matters;
(ii) conducting interviews with subject
matter experts;
(iii) hosting roundtable discussions and
expert panels; and
(iv) visiting facilities used to develop
AI; and
(B) to leverage existing expertise and research,
collaborate with a federally funded research and
development center that has conducted research on
strategies to secure AI models from nation-state actors
and other highly resourced actors.
(2) Nonapplicability of faca.--None of the activities
described in this subsection shall be construed to establish or
use an advisory committee subject to chapter 10 of title 5,
United States Code.
(e) Reports.--
(1) Initial report.--Not later than 90 days after the date
of the enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on the AI
Security Playbook under subsection (a), including a summary of
progress on the development of Playbook, an outline of
remaining sections, and any relevant insights about AI
security.
(2) Final report.--Not later than 270 days after the date
of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to the
appropriate congressional committees a report on the Playbook.
(3) Form.--The report submitted under paragraph (2)--
(A) shall include--
(i) an unclassified version suitable for
dissemination to relevant individuals,
including in the private sector; and
(ii) a publicly available version; and
(B) may include a classified annex.
(f) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in subsection (b)(4) shall be
construed to authorize or require any regulatory or enforcement action
by the United States Government.
(g) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) The term ``appropriate congressional committees'' means
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of
Representatives and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the
Senate.
(2) The terms ``artificial intelligence'' and ``AI'' have
the meaning given the term ``artificial intelligence'' in
section 238(g) of the John S. McCain National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Public Law 115-232; 10
U.S.C. note prec. 4061).
(3) The term ``covered AI technologies'' means advanced AI
(whether developed by the private sector, the United States
Government, or a public-private partnership) with critical
capabilities that the Director determines would pose a grave
national security threat if acquired or stolen by threat
actors, such as AI systems that match or exceed human expert
performance in relating to chemical, biological, radiological,
and nuclear matters, cyber offense, model autonomy, persuasion,
research and development, and self-improvement.
(4) The term ``technology theft'' means any unauthorized
acquisition, replication, or appropriation of covered AI
technologies or components of such technologies, including
models, model weights, architectures, or core algorithmic
insights, through any means, such as cyber attacks, insider
threats, and side-channel attacks, or exploitation of public
interfaces.
(5) The term ``threat actors'' means nation-state actors
and other highly resourced actors capable of technology theft.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select).
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line