No official summary available for this bill.
[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2153 Introduced in Senate (IS)]
<DOC>
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 2153
To promote competition and reduce gatekeeper power in the app economy,
increase choice, improve quality, and reduce costs for consumers.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 24, 2025
Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Lee, Ms. Klobuchar,
and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To promote competition and reduce gatekeeper power in the app economy,
increase choice, improve quality, and reduce costs for consumers.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Open App Markets Act''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) App.--The term ``app'' means a software application or
electronic service that may be run or directed by a user on a
computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose
consumer computing device.
(2) App store.--The term ``app store'' means a publicly
available website, software application, or other electronic
service that distributes apps from third-party developers to
users of a computer, a mobile device, or any other general
purpose consumer computing device.
(3) Covered company.--The term ``covered company'' means
any person that owns or controls--
(A) an app store for which users in the United
States exceed 50,000,000 on a monthly basis (inclusive
of support functions associated with the app store such
as updates to apps); and
(B) the operating system or operating system
configuration on which the app store described in
subparagraph (A) operates.
(4) Developer.--The term ``developer'' means a person that
owns or controls an app or an app store.
(5) In-app payment system.--The term ``in-app payment
system'' means an application, service, or user interface to
manage billing or process the payments from users of an app.
(6) Nonpublic business information.--The term ``nonpublic
business information'' means nonpublic data that is--
(A) derived from a developer or an app or app store
owned or controlled by a developer, including
interactions between users and the app or app store of
the developer; and
(B) collected by a covered company in the course of
operating an app store or providing an operating
system.
SEC. 3. PROTECTING A COMPETITIVE APP MARKET.
(a) Exclusivity and Tying.--A covered company shall not--
(1) require developers to use or enable an in-app payment
system owned or controlled by the covered company or any of its
business partners as a condition of the distribution of an app
on an app store or being accessible on an operating system;
(2) require as a term of distribution on an app store that
pricing terms or conditions of sale be equal to or more
favorable on its app store than the terms or conditions under
another app store; or
(3) take punitive action or otherwise impose less favorable
terms and conditions against a developer--
(A) for using or offering different pricing terms
or conditions of sale through another in-app payment
system or on another app store; or
(B) on the basis that an app provides access to
other third-party apps or games through remote
electronic services rather than through download from
an app store.
(b) Interference With Legitimate Business Communications.--A
covered company shall not impose restrictions on communications of
developers with the users of an app of the developer through the app or
direct outreach to a user concerning legitimate business offers, such
as pricing terms and product or service offerings. Nothing in this
subsection shall prohibit a covered company from requiring that an app
acquire user consent prior to the collection and sharing of the data of
the user by an app.
(c) Nonpublic Business Information.--A covered company shall not
use nonpublic business information derived from a third-party app for
the purpose of competing with that app.
(d) Interoperability.--A covered company that controls the
operating system or operating system configuration on which its app
store operates shall allow and provide readily accessible means for
users of that operating system to--
(1) choose third-party apps or app stores as defaults;
(2) install third-party apps or app stores through means
other than its app store; and
(3) hide or delete apps or app stores provided or
preinstalled by the covered company or any of its business
partners.
(e) Self-Preferencing in Search.--
(1) In general.--A covered company shall not provide
unequal treatment of apps in an app store through ranking
schemes, user interface features, or algorithms that
unreasonably preference or rank the apps of the covered company
or any of its business partners over those of other apps in
organic search results.
(2) Considerations.--Unreasonably preferencing does not
include clearly disclosed advertising.
(f) Open App Development.--
(1) Access.--A covered company shall provide access to
operating system interfaces and hardware and software features
to developers that are generally available to the public.
(2) Documentation.--A covered company shall provide
documentation and development information sufficient to access
such interfaces and features.
(3) Timely and equivalent basis.--A covered company shall
provide the access and documentation under this subsection on a
reasonably timely basis and on terms that are equivalent to the
terms for access by the covered company or to its business
partners.
SEC. 4. PROTECTING THE SECURITY AND PRIVACY OF USERS.
(a) In General.--
(1) No violation.--Subject to section (b), a covered
company shall not be in violation of section 3 for an action
that is--
(A) necessary to achieve user privacy or security;
(B) taken to prevent spam or fraud;
(C) necessary to prevent unlawful infringement of
preexisting intellectual property; or
(D) taken to prevent a violation of, or comply
with, Federal or State law.
(2) Privacy and security protections.--In paragraph (1),
the term ``necessary to achieve user privacy or security''
includes--
(A) allowing an end user to opt in, and providing
information regarding the reasonable risks, prior to
enabling installation of the third-party apps or app
stores;
(B) removing malicious or fraudulent apps or app
stores from an end user device;
(C) providing an end user with the means to verify
the authenticity and origin of third-party apps or app
stores; and
(D) providing an end user with the option to limit
access to the user's device or device features, or
limit the collection and sharing of the data of the
user with third-party apps or app stores.
(b) Requirements.--
(1) In general.--Subsection (a) shall only apply if the
covered company establishes by a preponderance of the evidence
that the action described in that subsection is--
(A) applied on a demonstrably consistent basis to--
(i) apps of the covered company or its
business partners; and
(ii) other apps; and
(B) narrowly tailored and could not be achieved
through a less discriminatory and technically possible
means.
(2) Certification.--The principal executive officer or
officers of the covered company, or persons performing similar
functions shall submit to the court a certification made under
penalty of perjury in accordance with section 1746 of title 28,
United States Code, that the action described in subsection (a)
is not used as a pretext to exclude, or impose unnecessary or
discriminatory terms on, third-party apps, in-app payment
systems, or alternative app stores.
SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT.
(a) Enforcement.--
(1) In general.--The Federal Trade Commission, the Attorney
General, and any attorney general of a State subject to the
requirements in paragraph (3) shall enforce this Act in the
same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction,
powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and
provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et
seq.), the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.), the Clayton Act
(15 U.S.C. 12 et seq.), and the Antitrust Civil Process Act (15
U.S.C. 1311 et seq.), as appropriate, were incorporated into
and made a part of this Act.
(2) Federal trade commission independent litigation
authority.--If the Federal Trade Commission has reason to
believe that a covered company violated this Act, the Federal
Trade Commission may commence a civil action, in its own name
by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to
recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in a
district court of the United States against the covered
company.
(3) Parens patriae.--Any attorney general of a State may
bring a civil action in the name of such State for a violation
of this Act as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons
residing in such State, in any district court of the United
States having jurisdiction of the defendant, and may secure any
form of relief provided for in this section.
(b) Suits by Developers Injured.--
(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (3), any
developer injured by reason of anything forbidden in this Act
may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in
the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has
an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and
shall recover threefold the damages by the developer sustained
and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
The court may award under this paragraph, pursuant to a motion
by such developer promptly made, simple interest on actual
damages for the period beginning on the date of service of the
pleading of the developer setting forth a claim under this Act
and ending on the date of judgment, or for any shorter period
therein, if the court finds that the award of such interest for
such period is just in the circumstances. In determining
whether an award of interest under this paragraph for any
period is just in the circumstances, the court shall consider
only--
(A) whether the developer or the opposing party, or
either party's representative, made motions or asserted
claims or defenses so lacking in merit as to show that
such party or representative acted intentionally for
delay or otherwise acted in bad faith;
(B) whether, in the course of the action involved,
the developer or the opposing party, or either party's
representative, violated any applicable rule, statute,
or court order providing for sanctions for dilatory
behavior or otherwise providing for expeditious
proceedings; and
(C) whether the developer or the opposing party, or
either party's representative, engaged in conduct
primarily for the purpose of delaying the litigation or
increasing the cost thereof.
(2) Injunctive relief.--Except as provided in paragraph
(3), any developer shall be entitled to sue for and have
injunctive relief, in any court of the United States having
jurisdiction over the parties, against threatened loss or
damage by a violation of this Act, when and under the same
conditions and principles as injunctive relief against
threatened conduct that will cause loss or damage is granted by
courts of equity, under the rules governing such proceedings,
and upon the execution of proper bond against damages for an
injunction improvidently granted and a showing that the danger
of irreparable loss or damage is immediate, a preliminary
injunction may issue. In any action under this paragraph in
which the plaintiff substantially prevails, the court shall
award the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee,
to such plaintiff.
(3) Foreign state-owned enterprises.--A developer of an app
that is owned by, or under the control of, a foreign state may
not bring an action under this subsection.
SEC. 6. REPORTING.
Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Federal Trade Commission, the Comptroller General of the United States,
and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice shall each
separately review and provide an in-depth analysis of the impact of
this Act on competition, innovation, barriers to entry, and
concentrations of market power or market share after the date of
enactment of this Act.
SEC. 7. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this Act may be construed--
(1) to limit--
(A) any authority of the Attorney General or the
Federal Trade Commission under the antitrust laws (as
defined in the first section of the Clayton Act (15
U.S.C. 12)), the Federal Trade Commission Act (15
U.S.C. 41 et seq.), or any other provision of law; or
(B) the application of any law;
(2) to require--
(A) a covered company to provide service under a
hardware or software warranty for damage caused by
third-party apps or app stores installed through means
other than the app store of the covered company; or
(B) customer service for the installation or
operation of third-party apps or app stores described
in subparagraph (A);
(3) to prevent an action taken by a covered company that is
reasonably tailored to protect the rights of third parties
under section 106, 1101, 1201, or 1401 of title 17, United
States Code, or rights actionable under sections 32 or 43 of
the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the registration and
protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the
provisions of certain international conventions, and for other
purposes'', approved July 5, 1946 (commonly known as the
``Lanham Act'' or the ``Trademark Act of 1946'') (15 U.S.C.
1114, 1125), or corollary State law;
(4) to require a covered company to license any
intellectual property, including any trade secrets, owned by or
licensed to the covered company;
(5) to prevent a covered company from asserting preexisting
rights of the covered company under intellectual property law
to prevent the unlawful use of any intellectual property owned
by or duly licensed to the covered company; or
(6) to require a covered company to interoperate or share
data with any person or business user that--
(A) is on any list maintained by the Federal
Government by which entities are identified as limited
or prohibited from engaging in economic transactions as
part of United States sanctions or export control
regimes;
(B) is a foreign entity that has been identified by
the Federal Government as a national security,
intelligence, or law enforcement risk, including the
Government of the People's Republic of China or the
government of a foreign adversary (as defined in
section 8(c) of the Secure and Trusted Communications
Networks Act of 2019 (473 U.S.C. 1607(c))); or
(C) is engaged in illegal or fraudulent activity.
SEC. 8. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Act, or the application of such a
provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be
unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of this Act, and the
application of such provisions to any person or circumstance shall not
be affected thereby.
SEC. 9. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Act shall take effect on the date that is 180 days after the
date of enactment of this Act.
<all>
Introduced in Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line