Amends the Clayton Act to authorize awards of prejudgment interest in antitrust litigation. Directs the court, in determining the justification for any such award, to consider whether the plaintiff or defendant: (1) made motions or asserted claims or defense lacking in merit intentionally for delay; (2) violated any applicable rule, statute, or court order providing sanctions for dilatory behavior; or (3) engaged in conduct primarily for delaying the litigation or increasing the costs thereof. Directs the court to consider whether the award of such interest is necessary to compensate the plaintiff for injuries sustained by such plaintiff. Specifies that such factors shall be the court's exclusive criteria in determining whether prejudgment interest shall be awarded.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary.
Reported to House from the Committee on the Judiciary with amendment, H. Rept. 96-875.
Reported to House from the Committee on the Judiciary with amendment, H. Rept. 96-875.
Measure called up by special rule in House.
Measure considered in House.
Passed/agreed to in House: Measure passed House, amended, roll call #317 (227-169).
Roll Call #317 (House)Measure passed House, amended, roll call #317 (227-169).
Roll Call #317 (House)Measure laid on table in House, S. 390 passed in lieu.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line