Combined Sewer Overflow Control Act - Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to make combined sewer overflow (CSO) (defined as the discharge of untreated sanitary wastes and stormwater from combined stormwater and sanitary sewers) unlawful, except in accordance with the requirements of this Act.
Requires any person owning or operating a combined stormwater and sanitary sewer from which there is CSO to notify the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency or the State of the CSO.
Directs the Administrator to issue any such person a permit authorizing such CSO which: (1) prohibits dry water overflow; (2) requires the permittee to implement technically sound operation and maintenance practices for its sewer system designed to minimize CSO and to maximize the use of its facilities to minimize CSO; and (3) implements the study and plan required by this Act to the extent such study and plan has not been previously implemented. Provides that permits authorizing CSO issued prior to the enactment of this Act shall remain in effect until reissued or modified in accordance with this Act.
Requires: (1) any such person to file with the Administrator a complete (phase II) permit application not later than 12 months after the effective date of the regulations required by this Act or two years after the effective date of this Act, whichever occurs last (deadline); and (2) the Administrator, within 12 months after the receipt of such application, to issue a permit to the applicant authorizing the CSO.
Mandates that: (1) each such person complete a study and evaluation of its combined sewer system and CSO and prepare a CSO control plan by the deadline; and (2) the Administrator, within two years, establish regulations setting forth the phase II permit requirements for CSO.
Sets forth additional requirements with respect to: (1) regulation contents; (2) technology-based controls; and (3) water quality-based controls.
Directs the Administrator to: (1) establish, within six months, a technological clearinghouse disseminating information on controlling CSO available to States and local governments; and (2) report to the Congress, within two years, with a list of CSO outfalls, the nature and location of such outfalls, and the estimated Federal share of such costs.
Requires that, whenever a State reviews water quality standards, it revises and adopts standards for those waters receiving storm sewer discharges and CSO overflow during wet weather conditions.
Authorizes appropriations.
Directs the Administrator to: (1) fund that portion of the cost of CSO controls beyond the financial capability of local governments upon the request of the Governor of the State in which the local government is located, subject to specified requirements; (2) set regulatory guidelines to be used by individual local governments with respect to CSO control costs; and (3) establish priorities for individual CSO control projects to be funded.
HR 3477 IH 102d CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3477 To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish a program to regulate combined sewer overflows, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES October 2, 1991 Mr. OLIN (for himself, Mr. PAYNE of Virginia, Mr. PICKETT, Mr. WOLF, Mr. SISISKY, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. BLILEY, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mrs. LLOYD, Mr. TRAFICANT, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. MORAN, Mr. WALSH, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. SLAUGHTER of Virginia, Mr. CAMP, Mr. MACHTLEY, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. BATEMAN, Mr. MARTIN, Mr. JONTZ, Mr. MATSUI, Mr. REGULA, Ms. LONG, Mr. RAY, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. BROOMFIELD, Mr. SWIFT, Mr. HENRY, Mrs. ROUKEMA, Mr. SABO, and Mr. DWYER of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Public Works and Transportation A BILL To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish a program to regulate combined sewer overflows, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be referred to as the `Combined Sewer Overflow Control Act'. SEC. 2. FINDINGS. The Congress finds that-- (1) combined sewer overflows are discharges from combined stormwater sewers and sanitary sewers, and that combined sewer overflows exist in hundreds of localities throughout the United States--principally in older urban localities that constructed their sewer systems long before the advent of wastewater treatment technology; (2) uncontrolled, combined sewer overflows can result in the degradation of the quality of the receiving waters; (3) it is essential that combined sewer overflows be controlled where they pose a threat to public health and the environment; (4) the total cost of controlling combined sewer overflows to comply with the current technology-based and water quality-based requirements of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) through sewer separation or the construction of conveyance and treatment technologies is in the many billions of dollars nationwide and beyond the financial capability of virtually every local government with a significant combined sewer overflow problem; (5) the nature and extent of the combined sewer overflow problem, as well as the effectiveness of combined sewer overflow control methods and technologies, is site-specific, and varies among localities based upon such factors as population size and density, topography, geology, land use, geography, climate, system design, sanitary flow characteristics, and receiving waters; (6) the design of effective combined sewer overflow controls cannot be generalized, but is complex and must be based on site-specific studies of the sewer system, the receiving waters and other factors; and (7) given the magnitude of the cost of combined sewer overflow control, and the complex and site-specific nature of the combined sewer overflow problem and combined sewer overflow controls, it is essential that combined sewer overflow controls be cost-effective, that there be flexibility with respect to data collection and monitoring requirements, the types of controls required of each local government and the time frames for implementation of those controls, and that there be a partnership between Federal, State, and local governments to fund the cost of combined sewer overflow controls. SEC. 3. REGULATION OF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS. Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1342; relating to the issuance of permits for the discharge of pollutants into waters) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: `(q) COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW- `(1) DEFINITIONS- For purposes of this subsection-- `(A) the term `combined sewer overflow' means the discharge of untreated sanitary wastes (including industrial wastes and other wastes conveyed through a sanitary sewer system) and stormwater from combined stormwater and sanitary sewers; `(B) the term `discharge' shall have the same definition as in section 502(16) of this Act; and `(C) the term `dry weather overflow' means the discharge of untreated sanitary wastes (including industrial wastes and other wastes conveyed through a sanitary sewer system) from combined stormwater sewers and sanitary sewers where the discharge is not caused by stormwater runoff or stormwater induced infiltration into the combined sewer system. `(2) GENERAL PROHIBITION- Combined sewer overflow shall be unlawful except in accordance with the requirements of this subsection (q). `(3) NOTIFICATION AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS- `(A) NOTIFICATION- Not later than 3 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, any person owning or operating a combined stormwater and sanitary sewer from which there is combined sewer overflow shall notify the Administrator or the State (in the case of a permit program approved under this section) of the combined sewer overflow. Said notification shall describe the number, location, and general characteristics of the overflow point or points, and shall state whether dry weather overflow occurs at one or more points in the combined sewer system. `(B) PHASE I PERMITS- Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Administrator or the State (in the case of a permit program approved under this section) shall issue to any person owning or operating a combined stormwater and sanitary sewer from which there is combined sewer overflow a permit authorizing such combined sewer overflow. Such permit shall-- `(i) prohibit dry weather overflow; `(ii) require the permittee to implement technically sound operation and maintenance practices for its sewer system designed to minimize combined sewer overflow; `(iii) require the permittee to maximize the use of its existing facilities to minimize combined sewer overflow; and `(iv) implement the study and plan required by paragraph (4) of this subsection in accordance with the requirements of that paragraph to the extent such study and plan has not been previously implemented. Permits authorizing combined sewer overflow issued prior to the date of the enactment of this subsection shall remain in effect until reissued or modified in accordance with this subparagraph. `(C) PHASE II PERMITS- Any person owning or operating a combined stormwater and sanitary sewer from which there is combined sewer overflow shall file with the Administrator or the State (in the case of a permit program approved under this section) a complete permit application not later than 12 months after the effective date of the regulations required by paragraph (5) of this subsection or not later than 2 years after the effective date of this subsection, whichever shall last occur. Not later than 12 months after the receipt of an application required by this subparagraph, the Administrator or the State (in the case of a permit program approved under this section) shall issue a permit to the applicant authorizing the combined sewer overflow. `(4) PLAN REQUIREMENT- Not later than 12 months after the effective date of the regulations required by paragraph (5) of this subsection or not later than 2 years after the effective date of this subsection, whichever shall last occur, each person owning or operating a combined stormwater or sanitary sewer from which there is combined sewer overflow shall complete a study and evaluation of its combined sewer system and combined sewer overflow and prepare a combined sewer overflow control plan. Such plan shall be submitted with and be a part of the permit application required by subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of this subsection. Such study and plan shall, at a minimum, identify, describe, and characterize the combined sewer overflow; describe and evaluate the range of technically feasible combined sewer overflow controls that could reasonably be applied to the combined sewer overflow considering site-specific conditions; identify, describe, and evaluate the relative costs and benefits of such alternative controls, and the predicted relative receiving water quality impacts of such alternative controls; describe the recommended combined sewer overflow controls, and contain a proposed schedule for implementing such controls consistent with the local government's financial capability to finance implementation of the plan with local funds as well as with Federal and State grant funding. The range of controls described and evaluated in the plan shall, at a minimum, include the technology-based controls identified in paragraph (7) of this subsection. The study and plan shall also contain an analysis of the cost of the recommended controls, the funding alternatives, and the owner or operator's financial capability to implement the recommended combined sewer overflow controls over the period of the proposed implementation schedule. Plans prepared prior to the effective date of this subsection, and meeting the minimum plan requirements herein, shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph. `(5) PERMIT REGULATIONS- Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Administrator, in consultation with State and local officials, shall establish regulations setting forth the phase II permit requirements for combined sewer overflow. `(6) REGULATION CONTENTS- In establishing the regulations required by paragraph (5) of this subsection, the Administrator shall provide for the following: `(A) Application forms and application requirements that take into account the need for flexibility based on-- `(i) the site-specific nature of combined sewer overflow and the differences among localities based upon such factors as population size and density, topography, geology, land use, geography, climate, system design, sanitary flow characteristics, receiving water characteristics, designated uses of the receiving waters, and the impacts of the combined sewer overflow on receiving water uses; and `(ii) the difficulty and expense of data collection because of the number of combined sewer overflow outfalls, the intermittent nature of combined sewer overflow, the locations of individual combined sewer overflow outfalls, and the difficulty in gaining access to such outfalls. `(B) Permit conditions and requirements that provide for the case-by-case, site-specific application of the technology-based and water quality-based controls identified in paragraphs (7) and (8) of this subsection. Said permit conditions and requirements shall provide for implementation of the recommended controls in the plan required by paragraph (4) of this subsection in accordance with the plan's recommended schedule unless such recommended controls or schedule are found to be inconsistent with the requirements of this subsection. `(C) Data and monitoring requirements that are cost-effective and use proven statistical sampling methods, that minimize sampling through the use of representative data collection, and avoid, wherever possible, sampling each combined sewer overflow outfall. `(D) Avoidance of data collection and monitoring requirements where not needed in the selection and implementation of a combined sewer overflow control plan. `(E) The use of system-wide permit applications and permits, wherever possible, in lieu of applications, forms, and permits for individual combined sewer overflow outfalls. `(7) TECHNOLOGY-BASED CONTROLS- `(A) Permits issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of this subsection may require implementation of the following minimum controls, applied on a case-by-case basis, taking into account site-specific factors: `(i) Proper operation and regular maintenance programs for the sewer system and the combined sewer overflow outfalls. `(ii) Maximum use of existing facilities. `(iii) Review and modification of pretreatment programs to assure that combined sewer overflow impacts are minimized: Provided, however, That neither the Administrator nor the State shall require pretreaters to meet limitations that would require capital expenditures that would not otherwise be required by pretreatment requirements imposed pursuant to section 307(b) of this Act. The foregoing shall not limit or in any way affect the authority of the local government to impose such pretreatment requirements as it deems appropriate. `(iv) Prohibition of dry weather overflow. `(B) In addition to the minimum technology-based controls specified in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (7) of this subsection, permits issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of this subsection may also require one or more of the following technology-based controls applied on a case-by-case basis, provided these controls are shown to be cost-effective. Such requirements shall be implemented as expeditiously as practicable taking into account (i) the ability of the owner or operator of the combined sewer overflow to finance the improvements without sacrificing essential governmental services and maintenance of its existing infrastructure, and (ii) the availability of Federal or State grant funding for the controls. Such controls may include, but not be limited to, one or more of the following: `(I) Improved operation and maintenance. `(II) Best management practices, including water conservation. `(III) System-wide stormwater management programs. `(IV) Pretreatment program modifications: Provided, however, That neither the Administrator nor the State shall require pretreaters to meet limitations that would require capital expenditures that would not otherwise be required by pretreatment requirements imposed pursuant to section 307(b) of this Act. The foregoing shall not limit or in any way affect the authority of the local government to impose such pretreatment requirements as it deems appropriate. `(V) Flow minimization and hydraulic improvements. `(VI) Direct treatment of combined sewer overflow. `(VII) Sewer rehabilitation. `(VIII) In-line and off-line storage. `(IX) Reduction of tidewater intrusion. `(X) Construction of combined sewer overflow controls within the sewer system or at the combined sewer overflow outfalls. `(XI) Sewer separation. `(XII) New or modified wastewater treatment facilities. `(XIII) Control of debris and floating materials. `(8) WATER QUALITY-BASED CONTROLS- `(A) Subject to the provisions of subparagraph (B) of this paragraph, in addition to the technology-based controls specified in paragraph (7) of this subsection, all permits issued pursuant to subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of this subsection shall require compliance with any applicable water quality standard established pursuant to this Act. Compliance with any such standard shall be achieved as expeditiously as practicable taking into account (i) the ability of the owner or operator of the combined sewer overflow to finance the improvements without sacrificing essential governmental services and maintenance of its existing infrastructure, and (ii) the availability of Federal or State grant funding for the controls. `(B) A variance may be granted to the application of any water quality standard to one or more combined sewer overflow outfalls where it is demonstrated that there is no reasonable relationship between the economic and social costs and the benefits to be obtained from compliance with such standard. `(9) TECHNOLOGICAL CLEARINGHOUSE- Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Administrator shall establish a technological clearinghouse which shall make available to States and local governments information on controlling combined sewer overflow. `(10) COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW INVENTORY- For purposes of establishing grant funding levels beyond the 2-year period provided for in section 5 of this Act, the Administrator, based on information provided by the States and local governments, shall transmit to Congress a report containing a list of combined sewer overflow outfalls, including the location of such outfalls, the nature of the discharges from such outfalls, the estimated costs of controlling the discharges from such outfalls pursuant to this subsection, and the estimated Federal share of such costs pursuant to the formula in section 5 of this Act. The report required by this paragraph shall be transmitted to Congress not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this subsection.'. SEC. 4. WET WEATHER STANDARDS. Section 303 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1313; relating to water quality standards and implementation plans) is amended by adding after subsection (c)(2)(B) the following new subparagraph relating to wet weather standards: `(C) Whenever a State reviews water quality standards pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection, or revises or adopts new standards pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection, such State shall revise and adopt, as appropriate, standards for those waters receiving storm sewer discharges and combined sewer overflow during wet weather conditions. Such wet weather standards shall provide for the protection of beneficial uses of the receiving waters taking into account the additional flows projected to occur in the receiving waters during periods of wet weather, and the intermittent nature of combined sewer overflow and storm sewer discharges.'. SEC. 5. GRANTS FOR CONTROL OF COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS. Paragraph (2) of subsection (n) of section 201 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1281(a)(2); relating to the issuance of grants to address combined sewer overflow) is amended by striking the entire paragraph and inserting in its place the following: `(2) The following sums are authorized to be appropriated in addition to those funds authorized in section 207 of the Act, and shall be authorized until expended: `(A) Fiscal year 1992, $500,000,000; and `(B) Fiscal year 1993, $500,000,000. Such sums are to be utilized to implement cost-effective controls to address adverse water quality impacts from combined sewer overflow from combined stormwater and sanitary sewers owned or operated by local governments where the local government requesting the grant has demonstrated in accordance with the criteria in paragraphs (3) and (4) of this subsection that it has committed local resources to control combined sewer overflow to the limit of its financial capability. Such sums shall be used by the Administrator to fund that portion of the cost of combined sewer overflow controls beyond the financial capability of the local government (less any State grant funds) upon the request of and demonstration of water quality benefits and financial limitations by the Governor of the State in which the local government is located. Financial commitments to control combined sewer overflow made by a local government prior to the date of the enactment of this paragraph shall be given full credit in such demonstration. `(3) That portion of combined sewer overflow control costs that would not result in local expenditures exceeding 1 percent of the median household income of residents served by the local government for all costs associated with wastewater and stormwater shall be deemed not to be beyond the local government's financial capability. That portion of combined sewer overflow control costs that would result in local expenditures exceeding 2 percent of the median household income of residents served by the local government for all costs associated with wastewater and stormwater shall be deemed to be beyond the local government's financial capability. Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Administrator shall establish regulations implementing this paragraph. Said regulations shall establish appropriate inflation factors to be used in determining the costs of combined sewer overflow controls and median household income. `(4) Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this paragraph, the Administrator, in consultation with State and local officials, shall establish regulations setting forth guidelines to be used by individual local governments whose combined sewer overflow control costs are in excess of 1 percent of the median household income of their residents pursuant to paragraph (3) of this subsection for the purpose of determining that portion of their combined sewer overflow control costs between 1 percent and 2 percent of median household income that is beyond their financial capability. In establishing the regulations required by this paragraph, the Administrator shall take into consideration the following factors as they relate to individual local governments: `(A) Bond rating, all outstanding debt, demographics, population, employment, income and distribution of income, surplus, property tax revenue as a percent of full market value of real property, overall net debt as a percent of full market value, overall net debt as a percent of personal income, direct net debt per capita, overall net debt per capita, operating ratio, coverage ratio, total debt payment as a percent of revenue. `(B) The trends of the factors in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph considered as a whole and the secondary financial impacts of all water-related environmental costs, including, but not limited to, impact on the local government's ability to fund other environmental programs, impact on the local government's ability to fund other local programs, impact on the local government's ability to maintain local infrastructure, impact on the local government's competitive employment position, and impact on the local government's economic development and stability. `(C) Consideration of the local government's total financial commitment to water-related environmental programs, present and future environmental and infrastructure costs, the cost-effectiveness and priority of individual environmental projects and the total environmental and infrastructure cost burden. `(5) Grants pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be made only for that portion of combined sewer overflow control costs determined to be beyond a local government's financial capability pursuant to the criteria in paragraphs (3) and (4) of this subsection. The amount of State grant funding provided to the local government pursuant to paragraph (6) of this subsection shall be subtracted from the amount eligible for Federal grant funding pursuant to this subsection. `(6) Grants pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be made only to those local governments whose States have committed grant funds to underwrite the cost of combined sewer overflow controls in an amount no less than 20 percent of the amount of their individual combined sewer overflow control costs eligible for Federal grant funding pursuant to paragraphs (3) and (4) of this subsection. State grant fund commitments to control combined sewer overflow made prior to the enactment of paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be given full credit in determining the amount of the State grant fund commitment. `(7) Sums authorized to be appropriated pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection for the fiscal years during the period beginning October 1, 1991, and ending September 30, 1993, shall be allotted to the States for each such year by the Administrator not later than the January 1st immediately preceding the beginning of the fiscal year for which authorized, except that the allotment for fiscal year 1992 shall be made not later than 120 days following the date of the enactment of paragraph (2) of this subsection. In making allotments, the Administrator shall establish priorities for the individual combined sewer overflow control projects to be funded. Allotments and priorities for each fiscal year shall be made in the discretion of the Administrator using the information provided by the States pursuant to paragraph (8) of this subsection based on the population served by individual combined stormwater and sanitary sewer systems and the extent of the water quality benefit from the combined sewer overflow controls to be funded. `(8) To assist the Administrator in allotting sums and priorizing control projects pursuant to paragraph (7) of this subsection, each State shall submit to the Administrator not later than November 1st immediately preceding the beginning of the fiscal year for which authorized a list of its local governments eligible for grant funding pursuant to paragraph (2) of this subsection, a detailed description of the local government's combined sewer overflow control plan and the water quality benefits projected from complete implementation of the plan, and the amount of Federal grant funding sought by the local government. The State list for fiscal year 1992 shall be submitted not later than 60 days following the date of the enactment of paragraph (2) of this subsection. `(9) Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the Administrator shall promulgate regulations implementing paragraphs (7) and (8) of this subsection.'.
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the House Committee on Public Works + Transportation.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line