Reinvesting and Ensuring America's Ability to Lead Act of 2013 - Requires the Director of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to: (1) prepare a 10-year long-term cost benefit analysis for each public introduced bill or resolution that determines its impact on American global competitiveness; and (2) devise criteria to evaluate such competitiveness, including the measure's impact on job creation, economic growth, consumption, investments, and savings.
Requires the analysis to evaluate whether the legislation will positively or negatively impact America's economic ability to compete globally compared to member nations of the Group of Twenty, or G-20, which comprise 19 country members and the European Union (EU), accounting for 90% of global gross domestic product (GDP) and 80% of global trade.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 381 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 381
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require long-term cost
benefit analyses of introduced bills.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 23, 2013
Mr. Fattah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the
Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for
a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to require long-term cost
benefit analyses of introduced bills.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Reinvesting and Ensuring America's
Ability to Lead Act of 2013''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) The bedrock of the Nation's economic strength and
future growth will be directly attributed to the robust Federal
investment in critical areas such as education, science,
technology, engineering, and mathematics.
(2) Recognizing the importance of education and its role in
maintaining America's position as an economic global leader,
President George H.W. Bush stated that ``U.S. students must be
the first in the world in math and science achievement. Every
American adult must be a skilled, literate worker and
citizen.''.
(3) As President Bill Clinton recognized when he created
the National Economic Council in 1992, ``The currency of
national strength in this new era will be denominated not only
in ships and tanks and planes, but in diplomas and patents and
paychecks.''.
(4) Recognizing diplomas and patents will not occur without
investing in education, President George W. Bush stated that
``we must address the low standing of American test scores
amongst industrialized nations in math and science, the very
subjects most likely to affect our future competitiveness.''.
(5) Similarly, President Obama has stated that America's
future economic growth and international competitiveness depend
on our Nation's willingness to educate, invest, and innovate.
(6) As stated in a recent report from the National Economic
Council, the Nation must ``create the jobs and industries of
the future by doing what America does best--investing in the
creativity and imagination of our people. To win the future, we
must out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the
world.''.
(7) Accordingly, Congress should be provided the means to
evaluate legislative worth beyond its impact to the annual
budget.
SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT OF 1974.
Section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 653)
is amended by inserting ``(a)'' after ``sec. 402.'' and by adding at
the end the following new subsection:
``(b)(1) The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall, to
the extent practicable, prepare a ten-year long-term cost benefit
analysis for each introduced bill or resolution of a public character
that determines its impact on American global competitiveness as
defined by the Congressional Budget Office.
``(2) The Director of the Congressional Budget Office shall devise
criteria to evaluate American global competitiveness, including the
bill or resolution's impact on--
``(A) job creation;
``(B) economic growth;
``(C) consumption;
``(D) investments; and
``(E) savings.
``(3) The analysis referred to in paragraph (1) shall evaluate
whether the introduced bill or resolution will positively or negatively
impact America's economic ability to compete globally compared to
member nations of the Group of Twenty, or G-20, which comprise of 19
country members and the European Union, accounting 90 percent of global
gross domestic product (GDP) and 80 percent of global trade.''.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line