Preventing Termination of Utility Services in Bankruptcy Act of 2014 - Amends federal bankruptcy law, with respect to the prohibition against disruption of utility services to a debtor, to declare that an individual debtor may not be required to furnish assurance of payment if he or she pays, within 20 days after the date of the order for relief, those debts owed to a utility for service during that period, and afterward also pays when due debts owed for service during the pendency of the case in bankruptcy.
[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5132 Introduced in House (IH)]
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5132
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to dispense with the
requirement of providing assurance of payment for utility services
under certain circumstances.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 17, 2014
Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Ms. Jackson Lee, Ms.
Norton, and Ms. Lofgren) introduced the following bill; which was
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To amend title 11 of the United States Code to dispense with the
requirement of providing assurance of payment for utility services
under certain circumstances.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Termination of Utility
Services in Bankruptcy Act of 2014''.
SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.
Section 366 of title 11, United States Code, is amended by adding
at the end the following:
``(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section in a case
in which the debtor is an individual, if the debtor pays in the 20-day
period beginning on the date of the order for relief debts owed to a
utility for service provided during such period and thereafter pays
when due debts owed to such utility for service provided during the
pendency of the case, then the debtor may not be required to furnish
assurance of payment.''.
<all>
Introduced in House
Introduced in House
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1193)
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial And Antitrust Law.
Llama 3.2 · runs locally in your browser
Ask anything about this bill. The AI reads the full text to answer.
Enter to send · Shift+Enter for new line